Fesruary tf, 1918 “In the event of a separate peace between Germany and Russia, the call declares the Russian republie and its councils will be surrounded on all sides by enemies, Krylenke continues: “‘American and French financiers are lending money to provide war material for Kaledin. The German bourgeoisie are quite prepared to use them as allies for stifling the Russian revolution. “ ‘These are conditions which raise for the Russian peasants and workmen the whole question of the defense of the conquest achieved by the revolition and of the holy war against. the bourgeoisie, not only of Russia, but of Germany, France and Great Britain. “‘Should the bourgeoisie be victorious they will take vengeance in the shape of the most cruel terror and torture, drenching the land with blood, and which would put in the shade the torments inflicted by the satellites of the Czar. “Tt may be that a holy war on the fronts ag well aa behind the lines stands before us as a terrible and unavoidable fate.’ “The appeal concludes by declaring that there will be no compulsion in recruiting.” Nicholas Lenine, the Bolshevik Dictator and Prime Minister of Russia, answers: “What are the Bolsheviks, and what do they want? The Bolsheviks are a communistic party representing first the day laborers; secondly, all such workmen as are, as Russians say, ‘Soznatelniye, that is, such as have a full class and political consciousness; and finally, the landless or nearly landless peasants. “These classes stand for immediate Socialism. ‘heir notion of Socialism is a republic ruled by the Councils of Workmen’s, Soldiers’ and Peasants’ Deputies. They are against every form of monarchy and every form of political power except such as reposes in the hands of the Councils of Deputies. They are against all governments of the type of the governments of Lvoff and Kerensky. They intend to prepare our two hundred million Russiang for government by the Councils of Deputies.” Others, too, see and dread the wind, earthquake and fire, not «discerning behind it all the wonders of the kingdom of God. Blinded by the god of this world and by his angels (messengers—clergymen—2 Corinthians 11:15) who have for centuries posed as messengers of light, they see the events but do not understand their significance. Prominent clergymen, with ears fairly itching to know what the people want to hear (2 Timothy 4:3), tell their deluded flocks that there is no trouble ahead, more than ordinary; thot if the people will only trust the (blind) guides they will all land in the Elysian fields of a better age, not realizing that they are on the very brink of anarchy. When the people wake up to the truth of the situation, they will have no pity on those trusted servants who lulled them to sleep on the verge of the precipice.—2 Chronicles 36:14-19. MEN’S HEARTS PAILING THEM FOR FEAR There are some watchers who are not clericals who warn drowsy Christendom in vain. Winston Churchill, in the “New York Times” of December 2nd, 1917, says: “The more one sees of this war, the more one is inclined to the belief that its real significance lies behind the battle lines rather than on them. Like the great war that followed the French Revolution, it has two aspects, the military and the social, and of these the social is the more serious of the two, as far as the future of the world is concerned. A process of ferment betokening profound social changes had for some time been going on with more or less intensity in various countries before the war’ began; and, contrary to certain prophecies, the war tended to hasten rather than retard the process. “The keynote of what is likely to happen in other allied countries in case of a German victory, or of even a pronounced German success, has been struck in Russia. That ferment has been seething for a long time. Since 1905 Russia has been waiting to overthrow a bureaucracy upheld by a mystical and fanatical Czar; the peasants, the army, from an outraged sense of betrayal, supported the revolution, whereupon the revolt at once took on the true evolutionary colors of the time. The inner significance of this war has to do with the emancipation of labor, just as the inner significance of that of a hundred years ago had to do with the emancipation of the shopkeeper—who has since become a plutocrat! We not only have to reconcile ourselves to that idea. but we have the immediate task before us of guiding this evolutionary tendency bv using all our intelligence on the problem, otherwise we shall have portions of the world given over to THE WATCH TOWER (35-36) anarchy and chaos. Jeremiah 51:9, Eds,] “Russia has had her revolution. And it is safe to say that in all the nations of the Western World something like a revolution is due: call it if you like, a profound change in the social fabric that will probably take place peacefully in all countries save Germany, where there is no constitutional outlet for the people’s will. “So far as the Allies are concerned, the probability of a social turnover that would paralyze a nation for the proper prosecution of the war is not unlikely to happen in Italy, France, and even in Britnin, provided the war continues to drag on and on and no more reverses are experienced, The peace propaganda is mostly among the working classes, but it must be remembered that the working classes have a potential, an economic power today far beyond the political power represented by their votes. They have a leverage of which they are becoming more and more aware. A great many of them are syndicalists. Wike the Junkers—and this is not said detrimentally, but impartially—they deem their first loyalty to be to their class, they are not inclined to reorganize nationa] boundaries: they argue that the more revolutions take place outside of Germany the more likelihood of a revolution inside of Germany; that the way to stop the war is by revohition—peaceful if possible. “This may or may not be true. The question for the responsible Governments of the nations concerned is whether it is worth while to take such a chance, Wouldn’t it be better by military means to force Germany to have her revolution first? That is exactly what, with her cleverness, Junker Germany is trying to do with the allies; she is sowing peace propaganda among their armies and their populations—now that Russia can no longer be kept an absolute monarchy, which would have suited her better. She has done a great deal of that sowing in Italy. “The situation, then, regarded as judicially as possible, appears to be this: Can we of the Entente, including America, ‘beat?’ Germany to the social upheaval?—to use slang expression. Can we force her, by properly co-ordinated military operations and the realization of a common purpose, to have her revolution first? If we can do this, we shall be in a position to guide witn more wisdom and less haste the evolutionarv changes that are coming in our own nations.” RESTLESS LABOR Pastor Russell long ago foretold the failure of the trade union as a bulwark for labor and the breakdown of Socialism as a national cure for the ills of discontent. How it is working out is deseribed editorially in a recent issue of the “Saturday Evening Post”: “All observers bear witness to a deep undercurrent of dissatisfaction among industrial wage-earners in England. We get glimpses of the same thing in France, Italy and Germany. Conservative organs like the London Times talk darkly about ‘the ferment of revolution,’ “Workers are experiencing an extensive application of state socialism. The plant is controlled by the state now, and operated not primarily for the profit of its private owners, but for state service. “And workers find this state control something much more formidable and intractable than the old private contro! was, Being the state, it changes laws at will, and a vast body of public opinion is unquestionably at its command. “Formerly the worker depended upon his trade-union; but that reliance is pretty largely broken down. The overwhelming state demands an extengive dilution of skilled labor— meaning that a great number of unskilled workers shall be admitted to the shop and taught the trade, though they have little or no attachment to the union and are but slightly amenable to its discipline. “The right to strike is rather effectually suspended; for striking against the state comes close to treason. Even the worker’s ancient right to better his condition by leaving one employer and going to another is restricted. In some cases he is the state’s industrial conscript and must have the state’s permission before he can leave. “Wages have advanced greatly; but so has the cost of living. The worker has less effectual voice in the industry than ever. The new ‘boss is far more powerful than the old. He ig not only the law but he is pretty largely public opinion. There is no one to whom the worker can take an appeal from him. “We is more remote from the worker than the old boss was—a far. formidable, invulnerable thing, which lives nowhere and everywhere. “And when the worker does meet this mighty new boss face to face he finds that it is really the old boss. The state [We would have healed Babylon.— [6207]
Ez a honlap cookie-kat használ a honlap és a felhasználói élmény fejlesztésére. A honlap további használatával hozzájárulsz a cookie-k használatához. Ha további információt szeretnél, vagy ha nem szeretnél hozzájárulni a cookie-k használatához, kérünk, látogass el az Adatvédelmi irányelvekHasználati feltételekoldalra.