6144-147) ZEON’S seek to keep God’s commandments, and do 30 willingly, not feeling them “grievous.” Thus we see that he is speaking only of the consecrated class; and since we know that there were none iighteous,—no, not one,—of all of Adam’s race, and sine: We know also that the unrighteous could not be accepted ay inint-sacrificers with Christ, we know assuredly that the Arastle John had in mind a class of consecrated and spiritbeyotten ones, who previously had been prepared by a knowlecye of Christ and by a faith in him unto justification. That “new creature” represented by the new mind which is now begotten of the holy spirit when the justified believer reaches that point where he sacrifices the human will and presents himself unreservedly to the Lord, is merely “begotten.” The present hfe is the formative period during which there is no independent life, but merely the reckoned one of our “mother,” the Abrahamie Covenant. (Gal. 4-23-31) Our birth will be in the first resurrection, when we shall be “born from the dead.” Then we shall have life and our mother covenant will be dead, having borne the promised seed that shall bless all nations. Compare Col. 1:18; Rev. 1:5. HOW WILL THE DEAD HEAR? Question.— What is implied by the expression, “The dead shall hear the voice of the Son of Man and they that hear shall live?”—John 5:25. Answer.—The Greek text seems to be in full harmony with the English, and neither can be understood logically and in harmony with other Scriptures, except by understanding this to mean that the dead of mankind shall be awakened to such a condition as will permit them to hear, comprehend, understand, tho they will still be dead from the divine standpoint —dead in tiespasses and sins—dead in the sense of being still under divine sentence of death. Then after hearing, comprehending, if they respond to the hearing, if they obey the voice, the command, the instruction, of that day of judgment, they shall eventually attain to perfection of life —hbeing raised to the living-point gradually by the processes of restitution or resurrection, by (through) judgments, during the Millennium. The fact is simply this, that a fall took place, a fall from a certain standing or condition of perfection and life and a redemption was provided at Calvary, on account of which there may be extended to all who fell an opportunity to rise again. The rising. be it never so insignificant in its begin ONLY A FEW ——FRANCES C. SHORE. Only a few more years to learn our part. Just a few more miles the race to run; So gather courage fresh, O fainting heart! O weary “feet,” thy journey soon is done. Only a few more months, but full of toil, For in the “field” are hungry souls to feed, Then struggle on, O weary, burdened one: For thou shalt find a strength in time of need. WATCH TOWER ALLEGHENY, Pa ning, must go on to completion—until the subject shall have been raised out of death into life. This raising up is necessarily up to the point or condition from which the fall occurred, and anything short of that would not be in the proper sense of the word a raising out of death and to perfection of ife. When considering the word anastasis it is proper that we should interpret it along this lime, which is its only true and logical meaning, and if it were in any place used in a less comprehensive sense, it would evidently be the exceptional use of it, and should not militate against its full meaning. But let us look for a moment at the resurrection cf the just ones and the resurrection of unjust ones. There will be no question as to the resurrection of just ones, that to them anastasis mean3 a perfect raising up to perfect conditions in the first resurrection. Likewise, we claim, is its meaning in respect to unjust ones. It does not say that all of the unjust ones will be raised up, and other Scriptures show that this will not be the case, but that only such of the unjust ones as will conform themselves to the laws of the kingdom, will thus be raised up and that others will fall back when but partly raised up and suffer second death;—those who refuse to hear (obey) their Lord in that day. Compare Acts 3:23. JOINING TRADE UNIONS Question.—Can I consistently join a Trade Union? I prefer to be free, but am threatened with loss of employment unless I join one. Answer.—The Lord’s injunctions are specifically along the lines of religion, and hence our separateness from unions should be specially along this line. A trade union has nothing of a religious worship connected with it, as have the churches and some of the secret orders. Of course, ag those who are free indeed in Christ, we would prefer not to incur any obligation except to the Lord, but if obliged to join a Trade Union to obtain employment, I think you would do right to join one. I would, however, state to them that I preferred not to join them (not for the sake of the dues, being quite willing to pay my share of maintaining the proper price of labor), but from a desire to be free, lest at some time the Union might wish to dictate to my conscience what would not agree with it. I would therefore give them notice at once that I would be obedient to the demands of the Union so far as my conscience agreed, and that only. MORE YEARS Only a few more days to fill with love— Love for all God’s creatures, friend and foe, Love which shall cover every human fault, And bring a balm for every earthly woe. Only a few more hours, we know, for some, Who in this life have fought a goodly fight, Henceforth for them remains a glorious crown, A rest within the radius of God’s light. Only a few more days of willing sacrifice, Of patient standing when our work is done; Soon in his radiant presence we'll rejoice, And praise him in our everlasting home. Vou, XXI ALLEGHENY, PA., MAY 15, 1900 No. 10 VIEWS FROM THE WATCH TOWER A ZIONIST LEADER’S VIEW OF JESUS Dr. Max Nordau, a widely known Hebrew leader, not long since in reply to a question concerning his view of Jesus, wrote the following :— “The picture of Jesus as we have it given by the synoptic gospels is a vague outline and is a typical and ideal Jewish character. He observed the law; he taught the morality of Hillel—love thy neighbor as thyself—he constantly occupied himself with matters of eternity; he felt himself in spiritual communion with God; he despised that which was mortal in his being and all the accidental things of this life on earth. All these are characteristic peculiarities of the best Jews of the time of the Roman supremacy, especially of the Essenes. And as to his origin and ethical physiognomy, there, too, the language of Jesus was throughout Jewish. For all of his parables, parallels can be found in greater or less abundance in the Talmud. His prayer, the most beautiful that a believer ever formulated, is the quintessence of Jewish ideas concerning the relations between man and his Creator. The Sermon on the Mount is the substance of rabbinical ethics; its figures and comparisons are common among the rabbis. “Jesus ig soul of our soul, as he is flesh of our flesh, and who, then, could think of excluding him from the people of Israel? St. Peter will continue to be the only Jew who will say of this descendant of David: I know not the man! If the Jews have not to the present time paid that tribute of public honor to the exalted moral beauty of the character of Jesus, the ground for this is to be sought in the fact that those who tormented them did so in his name. The Jews concluded what the Master was from the doings of the disciples. This was a wrong, but it was pardonable on the part {2630}
Folosim fișiere de tip cookie pentru a vă oferi o experienţă mai bună online și pentru a îmbunătăți acest site. Continuând să utilizați acest site, vă dați consimțământul asupra utilizării cookie-urilor. Dacă doriți mai multe informații sau nu acceptați folosirea acestor fișiere când utilizați site-ul nostru, vă rugăm să accesați paginile Politica de ConfidențialitateCondiții de utilizare.