Apri 1, 1901 sible from churches or governments under the present dispensation; to hold themselves ready for tremendous convulsions, ZION’S WATCH TOWER (131-132) and changes of all things established, and to expect their good things only from Christ’s second advent.” Vout. XXIT ALLEGHENY, PA., APRIL 15, 1901 No. 8 VIEWS FROM THE WATCH TOWER MISAPPREHENSIONS CORRECTED Some misunderstood an item in our March 1 View, namely, that we commended the course of the Boers and Filipinos and condemned Socialism. Nothing of the kind was meant. (1) THE UNITED STATES AND THE FILIPINOS. The Filipinos would have been much wiser to have thrown themselves upon the mercy and justice of the United States and, expressing thanks for deliverance from Spanish misrule, to have asked for civil and religious liberty under the protection of this great Republic. But their ignorant failure to take this course did not make it right to ignore their aspirations for liberty, and to treat them as enemies on this account. Rather they should have had from the very start distinct assurances and guarantees of as much liberty as they could show capacity for;—eventually full freedom. But the right policy was offset by land-hunger, commercialism and the spirit of empire building, willing to spend thousands of lives and millions of money for its gratification, This we condemn as being contrary to the spirit of Christ, the spirit of love, and as sure to bring its own reward in due time. (2) THE BRITISH AND THE BOERS. Others thought that we commended the Buers, because we rebuked the British Ministry’s lust for empire extension that would give British capitalists the control of Boer gold and diamond fields, at, however, a far greater cost of British lives and money than they expected. No one is deceived by the claim that the war was precipitated by Mr. Chamberlain’s desire to free the Boer slaves and correct the Boer morals: everybody knows that he had plenty of room to work along those lines at home, where thousands of white children are still the wage-slaves of commercial selfishness, and need deliverance and schooling and moral training. Neither are sensible people deceived by the plea that the war was precipitated by love of liberty and the desire to give the ballot to the assorted white foreigners, called Uitlanders. This was the pretext by which the statesman who engineered the war for commerciahsm and empire deluded the British masses and got their support. Indeed, the claim that Britain forced the war by insistance, that her own sons, known as “Uitlanders,” should be allowed to expatriate themselves as British and swear allegiance and support to the Boer repubhes, 1s laughable. The Boers well knew that such an oath to such men who openly avowed their hostility would be meaningless—-that at the very time they were ready to take the oath of allegiance these men were conspiring for a revoIution, In refusing the franchise under such circumstances to such persons, they did what cvery Briton would have done if in their stead. We by no means commend the Boers! We deprecate their low ideas of civilization, their practice of slavery of the native blacks, and their lack of lberality;—their narrowness and selfishness. But two wrongs do not make one right; and in our opmion the Boers should have been permitted to possess their land, and gradually improve its government as their ideas enlarged. It is but very few years since Britain took the step of giving the ballot, even under limitations, to her own sons We love and respect British character far more thin that of the Boers; and we refuse to believe that the British masses would have sanctioned this land-stealing war 11 South Atrica, had they not been blinded and deceived by then trusted political and financial leaders. Our appreciation of the Britons does not mean a love for their rulers, but for the people who more than once have shown their sturdy love of principle to the extent of compelling their rulers to adopt at home the very liberal government which they now enjoy as a consequence. But as the “god of this world” is using Doctors of Divinity to blind many to the divine plan and its justice and love. so he uses Doctors of Finance and Doctors of Politics to blind noble and liberty-loving nations to the rights and liberties of others. Thank God, the liberty of “the prince of this world” will soon be curtailed, that he shall “Deceire the peoples no more.”—Rev. 20:3. However, it is not and has never been our wish to dabble in worldly politics We are citizens of another country, even a heavenly, and have our Lord’s Word for it that none of the earthly kingdoms are his; but that they all are under the domination of “the prince of this world”—‘“the god of this world;” Satan, who will continue to blind and deceive the masses until our Master, according to promise, takes tne kingdom and restrains Satan. (Rev. 20:3) Then the blinding influences being removed and the true light shining, all ™men shall see clearly, and all the worthy will rejoice. Our object, in these occasional Views from the Tower, of Babylon’s matters and affairs, is to have all those who belong to the “holy nation” (1 Pet. 2:9) see how widely astray are all the kingdoms of this world, even tho they call themselves “Christian nations’—“Christendom.” We who are in harmony with the Lord and his righteousness must realize that the entire social structure is out of joint, else we could not so honestly and earnestly pray, “Thy kingdom come, thy will be done on earth as it is done in heaven,”’—knowing that the coming of God’s kingdom means the utter wreck of earthly kingdoms, in a time of trouble such as was not since there was a nation. Whoever sees no fault in present arrangements and conditions, but approves them, is not very fit for the kingdom. nor to be made one of the rulers under the new regime. On the other hand, however, we do not understand it to be the duty of the Lord’s consecrated people (“the saints”) to tirade and fight against the world. but to submit to its ordinances, except when conscience would be violated (1 Pet. 2:13), waiting patiently for the Lord’s promised kingdom as the only hope. Such are to realize that the worldly are blinded, and not to expect any to see the truth except such as have been specially blessed of the Lord and called to jointheirship with Christ in the kingdom, on condition that now they shall suffer with him for righteousness’ sake. (3) SOCIALISTIC PRINCIPLES APPROVED Some supposed us to be antagonistic to Socialism. Quite to the contrary; we are very sympathetic toward its aims, and merely object that they are wholly impracticable under present conditions. Unquestionably the new age will see many of the ideas of the Single-Taxers and Socialists, modified. in successful operation, under the auspices and backed by the power of the heavenly King and his kingdom, then in full contro], and Satan bound. But we warn any of the saints against building their hopes upon any relief which Socialism now promises. That anchor and its cable are of sand, and will crumble into direst anarchy as soon as put to the test. Our faith and anchor, on the contrary, are sure—faith in the promises of God. This faith anchorage fastened in the divine power will endure every strain. In proportion as any look to earthly sources for the deliverance of the “groaning creation” (Rom. 8°19-23) they are turning their backs on the heavenly Deliverer. And in proportion as we trust in the deliverance that 1s to be brought about by the second advent of Christ and the glorification of his elect “little flock,” to be the kings and priests of God’s kingdom, in that same degree we must rest all our confidence in it. True, if all the princes of earth, including the financial. the “captains of industry,” were to combine to establish Socialism, its temporary success would seem to be assured; but no sane man dreams of such conditions. And if established all will admit that it would be but an experiment, with the strong probabilities, all would admit (with the certainty, we would claim), that it would frequently contend with anarchy and have a continual fight. With the spint of selfishness entrenched in the hearts of the individuals, could we suppose that the endeavor to live collectively on the opposite basis of love would be very successful? Socialism can only succeed to a limited degree at present—to the extent that it benefits the intellectual and wealthy as well as the poor. Any attempt to carry it further will precipitate anarchy. Present aggregations of capital and industry are favorable to Socialism—government control, by the people and for the people. The masses seeing this will ere long attempt to grasp the throttle, expecting capitalists to submit to save their lives. But they are mistaken. Money and brains and selfishness are a strong combination, self-confident, resourceful, powerful. The result, as the Scriptures foretell, will not be Socialism but anarchy, humbling to the pride of the rich and the poor, the reformer and the demagogue. But that extremity will be the Lord’s opportunity. and on the [2799]
Folosim fișiere de tip cookie pentru a vă oferi o experienţă mai bună online și pentru a îmbunătăți acest site. Continuând să utilizați acest site, vă dați consimțământul asupra utilizării cookie-urilor. Dacă doriți mai multe informații sau nu acceptați folosirea acestor fișiere când utilizați site-ul nostru, vă rugăm să accesați paginile Politica de ConfidențialitateCondiții de utilizare.