Jury 1, 1904 and will be, so tremendous as to modify, possibly for all time, the relation of Europe to Asia. Until that battle had been fought the white race, though deeply impressed with the capacity of the Japanese and the devoted courage of Japanese sailors, was still unconvinced that a Japanese army could rival or defeat a European force of anything like adequate dimensions. The pride of the white continent had for three centuries seemed to be justified by history, and it created, consciously or unconsciously, a mass of belief which was perhaps the cause of many of its victories, and certainly of much of its daring. The struggle on the Yalu provides precisely the concrete evidence needed to dissipate this confidence. A Japanese army has crossed a mighty river in the teeth of European defenders, and then has marched upon those Europeans entrenched in a THE HAMILTON The One-Day Convention held at Hamilton, Canada, was quite a success in its way. Delegations were present from every quarter of Ontario—sixty-seven from Toronto, thirteen from Buffalo, about the same number from Brantford, and ones, twos and threes from many points. The morning session was for the interested only and was not advertised. The attendance was about 400. A praise and testimony meeting for 45 minutes was followed by a discourse on the divine promise,—‘No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper, and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the people of the Lord, and their righteousness is of me, saith the Lord.” (Isa. 54:17) A full report of this discourse appeared in the Pittsburgh Gazette of the day following, and many of ZION’S WATCH TOWER (197-198) splendid hilly position; has driven them out by the close nghting which we still call fighting with the bayonet; has overwhelmed the European fire by the superior weight of cannon and shells made in Japan itself; has captured whole batteries of European guns; has driven European artillerymen in what seems to have been headlong rout: and—most notable fact of all—has taken hundreds of European prisoners, who have surrendered, not by a capitulation, but while fighting on the field. In other words, an Asiatic Power has arisen which, besides defeating a European war-fleet, is proving itself able to use three great armies of invasion, each sixty thousand strong, with the careful precision, the strategic skill, and the clenching courage of armies directed by the great masters of European warfare.” CONVENTION our readers thus have it. We still have a few copies of the Gazette and will be pleased to send a sample on request. The atternoon session at 3 o’clock brought out a closely packed house, chairs being crowded in the aisles and probably fifty persons were seated on the platform behind the speaker. The friends estimated that at least 1,100 were present. Profound attention was given to our discourse on “God’s Oathbound Covenant to Abraham and his Seed.” (Heb. 6:17-20) This discourse appeared in full in the Hamilton Times of the mext day, and thus reached many more than were able to hear it. The “truth” people all looked and felt joyful in the Lord, and, as our train pulled away from the station, about fifty of us joined in singing, “God be with you till we meet again.” UNIVERSAL ANARCHY—JUST BEFORE OR AFTER OCTOBER, 1914 A. D. What seems at first glance the veriest trifle and wholly unrelated to the matter, has changed our conviction respecting the time when universal anarchy may be expected in accord with the prophetic numbers. We now expect that the anarchistic culmination of the great time of trouble which will precede the Millennial blessings will be after October, 1914, A. D. —very speedily thereafter, in our opinion—“in one hour,” “suddenly.” Our readers familiar with the presentation of the subject given in MiILLenniaAL Daww will recall that the date, October, 1914 A. D., is very sharply defined by two lines of evidence: (1) The Times of the Gentiles—2,520 years from the overthrow of the government of Zedekiah, the last typical king of the Jews, in 606 B. C.; and (2) the Parallels, both the length and various features of the Jewish and Gospel ages. We have found no flaw in either of these prophetic testimonies, nor do we believe that fault can be found with them along Scriptural lines by anybody. The matter that has just come to our attention is that in counting the forty years’ harvest of the Jewish age, from October, A. D. 29, to October, A. D. 69, where the year 70 in Jewish reckoning began, we spoke of that harvest time as ending A. D. 70. This is a correct enough statement, because the full end of 69 A. D. is up to the beginning of 70 A.D. We pointed out that the parallels of time in the harvest of this Gospel age began October, 1874, and will end October, 1914—at the beginning of 1915, Jewish time. All these matters stand just as they were —we have nothing to fault or to alter. But in a recent examination of the closing of the Jewish harvest, with a view to closer scrutiny as to what might be expected in the end of the present harvest of Christendom, we noticed that the actual fall of the Jewish polity was not at the beginning of A. D. 70, but towards its close, and at once we perceived that the forty-year harvest ending 69 A. D. closed before the destruction in its fullest sense came upon the typical people. Instantly we thought of the parallel here and perceived, as above stated, that our forty years’ harvest, ending October, 1914 A. D., should not be expected to include the awful period of anarchy which the Seriptures point out to be the fate of Christendom. The matter seems so plain and simple now that we wonder that we or our many critical readers did not notice it long ago. The only plausible explanation is that in the divine will our eyes were holden for the time respecting this matter—possibly with a view to our expectations that the harvesting opportunities would sooner close, causing our consequent greater zealin the service. Looking back to the prophetic testimony respecting the Times of the Gentiles, we perceive that, although the Lord did not give to worldly governments a definite lease of power until 1914, nevertheless our Lord’s words, ‘Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles be filled full,” gives the intimation broadly enough that the determined Iv—41 times or years in which the empire of earth would be in the hands of Gentile governments was a fixed one from the divine standpoint. And if, as we believe the Scriptures to teach, Gentile domination was provided for up to October, 1914, it would seem but a reasonable interpretation that divine power for the overthrow of the kingdoms of this world would not be exercised to their dethronement until after the time allotted for their reign had ended—October, 1914, True, it was to be in the times of these kings that the God of heaven would take from the mountain, without hands [not by human power], the little stone which should eventually smite the image in its feet. True, also, it was to be in the days of these last kings—represented in the toes of the image—that the God of heaven should set up his kingdom, which should break in pieces and consume all; but the setting up of that kingdom we understand has been in progress throughout this harvest time, especially since 1878, since which time we believe that all the overcomers of the church who die faithful are changed “in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye,” and are immediately constituted members of the set-up kingdom on the other side the veil. Quite probably this setting up will consume nearly or quite all of the forty years of harvest time apportioned to it; but in any event, the time for the smiting of the image in its feet will not come until October, 1914 A. D., however much trouble and distress of nations may result from the prior awakening of their peoples under the enlightening influences of the dawning of the Millennial morning. Already such distress or perplexity is felt in quarters national, financial and religious. Our previous expectation was that the anarchistie period would last some three or four years, and in our mental caleulations of the opportunities for harvest work, we naturally cut off those years, and the time thus appeared shorter to us. Now, however, we see clearly that for some of the chureh there probably remain fully ten years of experience, opportunities, testings, victories, joys and sorrows. Lach year, however, we may expect that the signs of the times will more and more demonstrate the accuracy of our expectations both for the church and for the world. As already pointed out, the harvest dates shown us in the Scriptures are October, 1874, as the beginning of the harvest; April, 1878, as the parallel to our Lord’s death; October, 1881, as the parallel to the tremination of the special favor to naturul Israelites in the sending of the Gospel to the Gentiles, Cornelius being the first; and October, 1914 A. D., as the end of the forty years’ harvest. Any other dates than these are purely speculative. We have never set forth any other dates as being presented by the Scriptures. We did indeed call attention to the date suggested bv one of the measurements through the upper step of the Great Pyramid’s “Grand Gallery,” but in conjunction with the suggestion we particularly intimated that it was merely speculative. [3389]
Folosim fișiere de tip cookie pentru a vă oferi o experienţă mai bună online și pentru a îmbunătăți acest site. Continuând să utilizați acest site, vă dați consimțământul asupra utilizării cookie-urilor. Dacă doriți mai multe informații sau nu acceptați folosirea acestor fișiere când utilizați site-ul nostru, vă rugăm să accesați paginile Politica de ConfidențialitateCondiții de utilizare.