(116-117) It strikes us as quite pharisaical on the part of the majority of mankind to make a great ado over the shortcomings of the rich, when in their own hearts the majority well know that the only reason they did not do likewise was that they did not have the opportunity. God forbid that we should say that there are no honest people in the world, but our experience with humanity leads us to the conclusion that the majority have their price—some higher and some lower, Experience, too, shows that those who decry cupidity in others are themselves frequently found wanting when tried in the balances. For instance, one of the most prominent of these life-insurance presidents went into office as a thorough reformer; he heartily reprobated the shortcomings of his predecessors. Do we not usually find it the same with politicians? The reformer of one election needs to be reformed at another election. The trouble is that the whole human family is weak and imperfect through the fall, and while they wou'd do good evil is present with them, and the temptations which assail are more than their characters will stand. As for the stronger characters in the world, those moulded and fashioned by the power of divine truth, they are rarely put in such positions of honor and trust, being too much out of harmony with the world and its spirit to be chosen. Even the preachers are accused of wire-pulling in connection with their securing desirable charges and principal offices in their denominations, Our Lord did not tolerate unrighteousness or injustice im any sense of the word, and his most seathing criticisms were hurled against the Pharisees because of their hypocrisy, because they pretended to be better than they really were. This gives us the thought that in the Lord’s estimation honesty is one of the noblest traits of character, and that it would be more pleasing in his sight for his followers to acknowledge that the whole world is imperfect through the fall, and that all need the divine merey, and to point cach other forward to the glorious kingdom of righteousncss whieh the Lord alone can establish, than that they should self-righteously point at the few evil-doers who had good opportunities, and attempt to justify the ma. jority of the race as though they were perfect, sinless, Let us wateh and pray against the temptations which lie in our path: let us sympathize with the exposure of everything that is sinful; but let us not glory in the rightecusness of the majority, who have not been found unfaithful because they have not been tempted in any considerable measure. Let us sympathize with the stopping of wrong doings while sympathizing also with the wrong doer and with the whole world in its depravity. Let us remember that the world has not the advantage of the higher ambitions and the new nature which are possessed by the Lord’s consecrated followers and let us have sympathy with them, while hoping and waiting and praying, ‘‘Thy kingdom come, thy will be done on earth as it is done in heaven.?? EVOLUTION IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM _ The world, perhaps, holds no other such single collection of scientific curiosities as can be found in the British Museum. Gallery after gallery, cabinet after cabinet, and mile after mile of shelving, exhibit a bewildering array of beasts, birds, fishes and moving creatures of every kind, stuffed and preserved, along with prchistorie relies, fossil forms and all the various specimens of organie life, Here would be the place of all others for the scientific skeptic of the day to trace the lincage of which he boasts, and to domonstrate his descent from the prehistoric monkey. But, unfortunately, the men who have the greatest opportunities do not always make the best improvement of them: and a large proportion of the talk about scientifie infidelity comes from men who know nothing of science. The editor of the ‘‘New York Evangelist’? publishes the following ar ZION’S WATCH TOWER ALLEGHENY, Pa. ticle containing the testimony from Mr, Etheridge, who stood at the head of the Natural Science department of the British Museum: ‘“‘Our friend and fellow-traveler in Palestine, Prof. George E, Post, is, as our readers are aware, a man of extensive attainments and wide and acute observation of facts and phenomena—in short, a man of science in the true sense. On the alert for whatever is worthy of atudy, it was a matter of course that while recently in London in quest of instruments and apparatus for the Medical Uollege at Beirut, he should spend some portion of his time in the British Museum—that immense storehouse of all that remains to us of the arts, the learning and life-conditions of the ages. Treated with the utmost courtesy by the large cirele of noted men and scholars, Di. Post very naturally, in the course of his visits to this great center of attraction, came in contact with Mr. Etheridge, than whom no one is more able to interpret and sum up whatever is there to be seen. Indeed, he had a special errand with him, and it thus fell out, in common phrase in a good sense, that the recognized British expert in all these matters was ‘interviewed’ by our American missionary and man of science as to his conclusions, his summing up of the bearing of the entire deposit there collected in the department of Natural History, and set in order as nowhere else in the world. And thanks to a correspondent, a former colleague of Dr. Post, we have here an account of Mr. Etheridge’s conclusions. They are given only in summary, but are clear and satisfactory as to what may be learned from a full study of the remains of all pre-historic periods. Their decisive bearing on the controversies of the day will be apnarent to all. It is seldom that so muth that is significant and entitled to great, even conclusive weight, is embraced in the same space: *¢ London, Aug. 2, 1885. ‘¢¢ Yesterday I was in the Natural History department of the British Museum. I had business touching some fossils which I found in the Lattakia Miocene and Pliocene elay beds, and about which I wrote an article which appeared in ‘‘Nature’’ last year. Mr, Etheridge, F. R. 8, kindly examined and named them. I was anxious to hear what a first-rate working scientist, with perhaps the largest opportunity for induction in the world, would say on Darwinian Evolution. So, after he had shown me all the wonders of the establishment, I asked him whether, after all, this was not the working out of mind and Providence. He turned to me with a clear, honest look into my eyes, and replied, ‘‘In all this great Museum there is not a particle of evidence of transmutation of species. Nine-tenths of the talk of evolutionists is sheer nonsense, not founded on observation, and wholly unsupported by fact. Men adopt a theory and then strain their facts to support it. I read in all their books, but they make no impression on my belief in the stability of species. Moreover, the talk of the great antiquity of man is of the same value. There is no such thing as a fossil man. Men are ready to regard you as a fool if you do not go with them in all their vagaries. But this Museum is full of proofs of the utter falsity of their views.’’ «¢¢J have condensed very much, but you may spread this out over twenty minutes, and imagine what a comfort it was to hear it. I do not propose to surrender yet even to theistic evolution, which seems to me at best a bad name for God’s creation.’ ’? Now we want to hear the verdict of bar-room scientists, saloon geologists and horse-shed philosophers, who are more anxious to establish a connection with the monkeys and baboons than with Adam, who ‘‘was the son of God.’’— From ‘‘The Armory.’? WHEELING AND LOUISVILLE CONVENTIONS The interest in Wheeling seemed to warrant us in giving it a second one-day convention soonér than usual— on Mareh 18. The topie for the publie service was ‘‘ Resurrection of Damnation.’? The forenoon discourse was given in Odd Fellows’ Hall and was well attended by the interested, though not publicly announced. That discourse was published in the secular journals which many of you receive, The afternoon discourse was for the public. The services were held in Court Theater, the largest auditorium in the city; the attendance was large, and the attention and interest manifested were very gratifying indeed. The number present was estimated at 1,400. At this meeting announcement was made for two chart talks on the following Sunday in a smaller auditorium. Brother A. E, Wil liamson filled the appointments and had excellent hearings at both sessions. Our thought is that it requires several discourses to mature the interest first aroused, and that of the thousands who hear with some degree of interest only a small number are to be expected to have the deep interest which could only be looked for in the fully conseerated of the Lord’s people. The dear friends at Wheeling did nobly and feel very much encouraged. Louisville, Ky., had its first one-day convention on March 25. The locally interested were ably seconded in their efforts to make the convention a success by dear friends residing in nearby communities. Their mutual efforts under the Lord’s blessing and providential guidance resulted in a great arousing of the people of that vicinity. [3758]
Folosim fișiere de tip cookie pentru a vă oferi o experienţă mai bună online și pentru a îmbunătăți acest site. Continuând să utilizați acest site, vă dați consimțământul asupra utilizării cookie-urilor. Dacă doriți mai multe informații sau nu acceptați folosirea acestor fișiere când utilizați site-ul nostru, vă rugăm să accesați paginile Politica de ConfidențialitateCondiții de utilizare.