(47-51) the church when quarrels arise it will generally be found that the basis of the quarrel is a misunderstanding or selfishness, covetousness, a desire to be chief and greatest. It behooves each of the Lord’s people under such circumstances to examine well his own heart, and to see that his own eye is good before he attempts to assist his brother who has the opposite view. Having made sure of his own generosity of heart, and intent and willingness to yield, and to see and admire and approve the good in others, he will then be prepared to reason with others and to help them to also take the proper, broad, generous view of the situation. ‘‘Let nothing be done through strife or vain glory,’’ urges the Apostle—neither in the church nor in the home. Love is the only motive power that should be recognized amongst those who have passed from death unto life, who are new creatures in Christ Jesus. There is generally a peaceful way ZION’S WATCH TOWER ALLEGHENY, Pa. of settling all differences, and our Lord himself has set it forth, and we have presented the matter in detail in Dawn, Vol. vi, chap. vi. But, where all fails, rather than allow the spirit of brotherhood to fail and enmity or anger to prevail, it were far better that those who find themselves totally unable to fellowship in love together should seek to maintain fellowship in spirit by a separation, as in the case of Abraham and Lot. Nevertheless while this is to be approved as a final resort rather than to have internal strife, the necessity for such a course would certainly be lamentable—it would certainly imply that some if not all of the company were very immature as respects the new nature, very deficient as respects the powers of a peacemaker, very lacking in the brotherly love which can hide a multitude of faults, and endure much with long-suffering and patience, gentleness, kindness and love. HOW READEST THOU?—CAREFULLY ? Dear Brother Russell: I am perplexed by what I have read in the January 1 issue of the Tower, respecting the bullock sacrificed for the Levites and the goat for the other tribes—p. 11. Am I right in understanding you to teach that Jesus redeemed the church and the church is to redeem the world? If so how could this be harmonized with these Scriptures: (1) ‘‘Jesus Christ ... tasted death for every man’’; (2) ‘‘As all in Adam die, even so all in Christ shall be made alive’’; (3) ‘‘He is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world’’; (4) and that ‘‘he gave himself a ransom for all.’’ * * * We reply: No, dear brother, you have misread and misunderstood the article, considerably. You have never read in any of our articles or books or sermons the statement that the church redeems any thing or any body. Quite to the contrary: we have often been aceused of making a hobby of the ransom doctrine,—that our Lord Jesus ‘‘tasted death for every man,’’ ‘‘gave himself a ransom for all.’’ Surely no other writings ever more zealously upheld the ransom as the very center of Christian faith. The trouble, dear brother, is that you have read into our article things which are not in it. This overbrilliancy is a fault common to many of us. Do we not see it illustrated in all of our experiences with the Word of God? Which of us has not had his principal difficulty along this line of reading into or out of the Word of God enough to confuse us? We cannot, therefore, chide you for misreading our message. Reading the article in question more carefully you will perceive that it is not discussing the Redemption, but the Sin-Offering, which is a different view of the great transaction. Briefly examining the texts you quote we find: (1) Vout. XXVIII ALLEGHENY, PA., FEBRUARY 15, 1907 They teach that the death of Christ is the fowndation upon which the hope of every man’s salvation rests. Whatever blessing ultimately shall come to every man must result from the death of Jesus, however others may subsequently be associated with him in the work. (2) The grand truth that none can ever have eternal life except by relationship with Jesus in no way hinders the Lord from using the church as his assistant and agent in bringing the world into that blessed state. (3) Truly our Lord is already the propitiation for the church’s sins, because he ‘‘appeared in the presence of God for us.’’ It is also true that the satisfaction of justice which he effects will ultimately be extended to all mankind at the close of this age and the opening of the Millennium; but this does not hinder our Lord from accepting the church as ‘‘members of his body’’ and sacrificing them as such during this antitypical Atonement Day. (4) Our Lord truly gave himself ‘‘a ransom for all’’ eighteen centuries ago, but evidently he has not yet applied the benefits to any except ‘the household of faith.’? And meantime what difference does it make to the world if by the Father’s plan our Redeemer reckons to adopt the church as ‘‘members of his body’’ and allows these to participate in the sufferings of Christ in this present time and thus also to share coming glories? Summing up the matter: We, believers, have no _personal standing before God nor share in the sacrifice of the sin-offering. It is only those who are ‘‘beheaded,’’ and thus cease to be themselves and are accepted as members of the Anointed One—the Christ—only these share the sufferings or the glory of Christ. Jesus the Head docs all the sacrificing. All of the under priests are represented in the High Priest as his members. They all are associated, but the Head is the recognized representative of all. No. 4 VIEWS FROM THE WATCH TOWER CURRENT AFFAIRS IN GERMANY According to the advices received from the Society’s representative in Germany there is a great religious unrest there at the present time. Roman Catholics are stoutly resisting the movement known as ‘‘Los von Rom’’—1. ¢., ‘Away from Rome’’—and the tendency of our times to individual thinking on the part of its supporters, Its party in the German parliament—the Reichstag—is now very necessary to the government in connection with the passage of government measures, because the Socialist party has become so strong. Under the patronage of the Emperor, Catholies are proclaiming loudly the duty of loyalty to religion and the government, even though not a great while ago they were quite willing to inveigh against that very same government. The cry now 1s for the necessity of all religious people uniting in opposition to infidelity and revolutionary parties. Protestants, under similar influences, are taking somewhat the same stand, but decline to be brought too closely into union with the Church of Rome. Thus the question of the hour is held to be outward formalistic religion and patriotism to the government. Under this plea, no doubt, Socialists and Revolutionists will be more and more opposed year by year, and no doubt ourselves, and others considered out of line with the majority of ‘‘Orthodoxy,’’ will be similarly brought under the ban, and treated as though we were in some way associated with or responsible for the revolutionary conditions and their program. Unable to seeure legislation desired by him Emperor William recently dissolved the German Reichstag (Congress) and ordered a fresh election at which a stout contest was made by the three leading parties, one of which, the SocialDemocrat, had been too powerful for the Emperor’s purposes. It is claimed that the Emperor appealed to the Pope to infiuence the Catholic vote away from the Socialist party because they were a menace to both church and state. The election certainly reflects this, for in it the Socialists lost 34 members of the Reichstag. The event was celebrated at Berlin, where noisy crowds saluted the Emperor and subsequently the Crown Prince. The effect will be to more than ever separate the religious from the Socialists and drive the irreligious to them. Thus we see the cleavage coming along the very lines laid down in prophecy—on the one side ‘‘the beast and his image and the kings of the earth and their armies’’ or supporters, and on the other side the army of anarchy, which unwittingly will as ‘‘the Lord’s great army’’ overthrow all present institutions preparatory to the Millennial reign of peace and righteousness. But Jet us never lose sight of the fact that the ‘‘saints,’’ the ‘‘elect,’’ have nothing to do with supporting or assisting either side in that awful conflict. It is the Father that shall put all things under the control of the Christ. It will be accomplished by the letting go of natural laws, ‘‘the loosing of the winds,’’ which will allow human selfishness on both sides to wreck the pres [3940]
Folosim fișiere de tip cookie pentru a vă oferi o experienţă mai bună online și pentru a îmbunătăți acest site. Continuând să utilizați acest site, vă dați consimțământul asupra utilizării cookie-urilor. Dacă doriți mai multe informații sau nu acceptați folosirea acestor fișiere când utilizați site-ul nostru, vă rugăm să accesați paginile Politica de ConfidențialitateCondiții de utilizare.