(206-211) church as the New Testament church, but you made a clear cut of it, declaring that the New Covenant is not yet in existence, that it belongs to the Millennial age. This declaration dispelled the mist and caused me to see the wondrous doings of our God more clearly. The Seed promised in the Abrahamic Covenant is to bless Israel and all nations by the arrangement of the New Covenant. The New Covenant will be established as soon as its Mediator, Christ Head and body, shall have been completed. Then will begin the great transaction. Christ as the High Priest shall enter into the Most Holy with the blood of the church to justify God in his act of letting the world go from the chain of death—legally. God will then be at liberty to exhibit his wisdom, love and power toward mankind. The work of the atonement will then be finished and Christ shall come forth as the Mediator. The antitypical Ishmael, the Jewish nation, shall come from the wilderness condition to the promised land, even to Mt. Zion, the center from which God will rule the world during the Millennium, The New Covenant will be sealed and the precious work will begin—the work of taking away the sing of Israel and the taking away of the sins of the world, aud the writing of the law of God in the hearts of the children of Israel] and in the hearts of the people of other natiuns. You have brought wonderful things to my attention. I am taken captive by these things. What am I that I should come under the offer of getting the choicest portion of the Abrahamic Covenant? I remember the days when I was reading and thinking of the two covenants mentioned by Paul in Galatians 4, but I did not understand, so I have watched and received eagerly whatsoever has come from your pen along the line of the covenants. How precious it is to walk under the light shed upon them! Precious, sanctifying truths indeed they are. Daily I remember you and all your dear colaborers at the throne of heavenly grace. Yours in love of the truth, K. P. HAMMER,—Can. Dear BROTHER RUSSELL: — For some time I have wanted to write and tell you how greatly I have been blessed since making the Vow my own, which I did at 11:15 p. m., January 9 last. Words fail to express the peace of mind I experienced as soon as I registered it with our heavenly Father. I am happier now than I have been since I came into present truth, and can truthfully say, each THE WATCH TOWER Brooxtyn, N. Y. day I have received more light and knowledge and have increased joy in the Lord and in his service. My heart overflows with gratitude and extreme thankfulness to our heavenly Father for his goodness to me. Dear Brother Russell, I grieve very much when I think of the things I believed and thought of you. I am very deeply impressed by the way in which you have taken this trial and by your love for the brethren amid such terrible persecution, and I want you to know you have my heartfelt sympathy. I pray that those who are still in opposition may also have the eyes of their understanding opened before it is too late. May the Lord’s blessings be with you all in “Bethel Home.” May I ask you to pray on my behalf? With much Christian love to you all, Your sister in the blessed Lord, M. L. JamMes,—Pa, Deak BELOVED BROTHER RUSSELL :— I rejoice to tell you that Saturday, April 24th, the anniversary of the day I registered my “vow” to the Lord, found me “safe in the arms of Jesus,” much grace having been obtained in time of need. I love the Vow’s sanctifying power and protec tion. The Lord bless thee abundantly. With sincere love and prayers, By his grace, C. WHITE,—Texas. Deak BROTHER IN CHRIST:—— “Grace to you, and peace, from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.” “We give thanks to God always for you, making mention of you in our prayers daily,” “Remembering without ceasing, your work of faith and labor of love, and patience of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ”; making request that your trip among the dear ones abroad may be prosperous and assist in “building up many in the most holy faith.” I want to tell you what a great blessing the vow has been to me—and especially so since Brother Brown went home and I have had no earthly one to lean upon. The dear Lord has been very near, guarding and strengthening me for the daily battle with “the world, the flesh and the adversary.” “May he who is able to guard you from stumbling and to set you before the presence of his glory, without blemish, in exceeding joy,” be with you to the end of your life’s journey. Your sister in the Anointed, Marcarer RED Brown. Vout. XXX BROOKLYN, N. Y., JULY 15, 1909 No. 14 VIEWS FROM THE WATCH TOWER EVOLUTION AND CHARACTER In his book on “The Wonderful Century,” published ten years ago, Alfred Russel Wallace, the distinguished scientist and co-discoverer with Charles Darwin of the theory of Evolution, asserted his conviction that, in the matter of mechanical discovery, the human race had made more progress in the nineteenth century than in all the preceding eighteen centuries. It is somewhat difficult to reconcile this statement with the attitude he takes in his latest article on “Evolution and Character” in The Fortnightly Review. He has evidently grown more pessimistic. He declares now that it is doubtful if there has been “any considerable improvement in man’s average intellectual and moral status during the whole period of human history”; and he says further: “In comparing a savage with a civilized race, we must always remember that the amount of acquired and applied knowledge which we possess is no criterion of mental superiority on our side, or of inferiority on his. The average Zulu or Fijian may be very little lower mentally than the average Englishman; and it is, I think, quite certain that the average Britain, Saxon, Dane and Norseman of a thousand years ago— the ancestral stocks of the present English race—were mentally our equals. For what power has been since at work to improve them? There has certainly been no special survival of the more intellectual and moral, but rather the reverse. ... When we consider further that the effects of education and the arts are not hereditary, we shall be forced to the conclusion that we are today, in all probability, mentally and morally inferior to our semi-barbaric ancestors!” The Romans and the Greeks, Mr. Wallace reminds us, looked down on their ancestors with just as much contempt as we look down on Kaffirs and Red Indians, It is quite superficial to conclude that because people are in a savage or barbarian state as regards knowledge and material civilization, they are necessarily inferior intellectually or morally. “I am inclined to believe,” says Mr. Wallace, “that an unbiased examination of the question would lead us to the conclusion that there is no good evidence of any difference in man’s average intellectual and moral status during the whole period of human history at all corresponding with differences in material civilization between civilized and savage races today.... There is good reason to believe that some of the lowest savages today (perhaps all of them) are the deteriorated remnants of more civilized peoples.” MENACE OF YELLOW JOURNALISM One of the severest and keenest indictments of yellow journalism ever written has lately appeared in The American Magazine from the pen of Prof. W. I. Thomas, of the University of Chicago. He takes the ground that the yellow papers published and spread broadcast in our American cities today are “a positive agent of vice and crime,” making for all kinds of immorality. Our failure up to the present time to regard the yellow press as an immorality and to take steps to exterminate it is due, he thinks, in part to the fact that we have been reluetant to lose a time-honored faith in the printed page, and in part to the slowness with which we carry generalizations into practice. In connection with this last point he writes: “Moral exactions never, in point of fact, reflect the most advanced states of consciousness. Our practices run behind our judgments by a generation or two, but that we do slowly and surely carry our generalizations into practice is indicated by the fact that society has since the beginning been constantly changing the content of its commandments, and practices which at one time were not the objects of moral judgment (slavery, polygamy, blood-vengeance) have come to be classed as immoral, At the present moment there is a focus of consciousness containing commandments in the making. In it are located questions of political graft, monopolistic manipulation, the tyranny of labor, patent medicine fakes, impure foods, the race question, the woman question, and the question of the yellow journal. These are now being agitated and revalued by public opinion and the legitimate press, and when we have made our reconstruction we shall have some new commandments and some new crimes; and among them will be: Thou shalt, not have the perversion of truth for a gainful occupaion. Professor Thomas’ first and fundamental objection to yellow journalism is based on its appeal to what he calls the “hate [4430]
Folosim fișiere de tip cookie pentru a vă oferi o experienţă mai bună online și pentru a îmbunătăți acest site. Continuând să utilizați acest site, vă dați consimțământul asupra utilizării cookie-urilor. Dacă doriți mai multe informații sau nu acceptați folosirea acestor fișiere când utilizați site-ul nostru, vă rugăm să accesați paginile Politica de ConfidențialitateCondiții de utilizare.