(336-339) possessors of these, but merely the stewards, whose privilege it is to use them as best they may know how, in the Master’s service, and to the forwarding of the interests of righteousness in the preparation of themselves and others for his appearing and kingdom. The Apostle speaks of our Lord Jesus as “our great God and Savior,” and this is in full accord with the general teachings of the Scriptures. Our Lord Jesus is a mighty one, a great one amongst the mighty ones, and as our Lord himself declares. all should “honor the Son even as they honor the Father.”—John 1:1; 5:22, The Apostle presents in another consideration why we should be exercised by this blessed hope of the Lord’s second coming and our gathering together to him as his elect church. It is not merely that we should think of life everlasting and glory in which we might share; but that we should think also that this One comimg in glory, and to whom we hope to he joined everlastingly, as members of the bride, to the Bridegroom—is no other than he who gave himself for us, who sacrificed his own life in our redemption. We are to remember, too, that he not only redeemed us from the penalty of sin, death, but that the redemption which he purposes and provides is more than a redemption from iniquity, from sin. We are to remember also that this purging away of sin and the instruction and cleansing which the Word of truth is to Vou. XX oa ZION’S WATCH TOWER ALLEGHENY, PA., NOVEMBER 15, 1900 ALLEcHENY, Pa. do for us, as the Apostle has foregoing set forth, is to the intent that by these means the Lord may “purify unto himself a peculiar people’—a people different from others, possessed of a special love for that which is just, that which is pure, that which is noble, that which is good; and who, despite the imperfections of their mortal bodies, are striving to cultivate these graces more and more in their hearts, and to keep their bodies in subjection. Moreover, says the Apostle, these peculiar people will be “zealous of good works,” earnestly desirous and striving to do good unto all men as they have opportunity, physically, mentally, morally,—and especially to do good to the household of faith. The Apostle’s exhortation, in conclusion, is that Titus shall speak and exhort the church along these lines which he has laid down, reproving them, whenever necessary (in love and gentleness, and yet with full authority, not doubting as to the meaning of the divine instruction). He was to let no man despise him, in the sense that he was to declare these principles of righteousness governing the Lord’s people in a plain, positive and authoritative manner. He was to speak with authority and not as with uncertainty and questioning. And so let us speak, each and all, to ourselves and to others, setting forth the principles of this salvation which has appeared to us, with no uncertain sound, that thus we may minister grace to the hearers and glorify our Father in heaven and our Redeemer and Deliverer. No. 22 VIEWS FROM THE WATCH TOWER IS NATURE CRUEL? This question has already been answered by some eminent authorities in the affirmative, and the belief that such an answer is the correct one is widespread. Sir Samuel Baker declares that nature “ig a system of terrorism from the beginning to the end,” and John Stuart Mill asserts that if there are marks of design in creation, “one of the things most evidently designed is that a large proportion of all animals should pass their existence in tormenting and devouring other animals.” If we assume nature to be the work of a Being of infinite power, he concludes that “the most atrocious enoimities of the worst men will be more than justified by the apparent 1tention of Providence that throughout all animated nature the strong should prey on the weak.” These radical usaertions are controverted by J, C. Hirst, of Liverpool, England, in a book whose title is the same as the head of this aiticle (Londen, 1900}, After examining the experiences of hunters of big game, he concludes in the first place that Sir Samuel Baker’. dictum is untiue. We quote from a review in Gur Aneonated Frinds (October) the following abstract of jas veument:>— “Where there is terrorism there must be terror, and terror is one of the most horrible of sufferings. Is it true, then, that the amuals most exposed to the attacks of the carnivora suffer grcitly from terror? We believe that it is alwot enticlh untiue. Terror in human beings is largely due to the imagiation..... Have we any reason to believe thit the lewer animals have a similar terior of imagination? We have geal reason to believe the contrary. Mr. J. D. inveraritv tals the folowing incident. A poor donkey was ‘tied-oud’?: that is. ag a bait for a lion. The lion approached, but the hunter, leoking through his peephole, saw the donkey stendiy unbarmed, while the lion went on growling. It was atterwuod Ciscevered that the lion had actually tried to throw the dontev over with his paw and had failed, altho it had seriched the donkey on the inner ‘ side of the leg. But within a few minutes of the donkey being attacked. it was euimly cating which showed its nerves were not affected.’ “sa. Weollace maiutains that ‘the constant effort to escape encmics, the ever-recurring strugele against the forces of nature” ore ‘the verv means by which much of the beauty and harmenv and enjoyment of nature are produced. To what else is it that the fieetness of the horse and of the many species of deer and antelopes is due? To what else, indeed, hut the perpetual stimulus to exert their utmost speed, which ig caused hy the fear of enemies? But is not this fear the very terror which Sir Samuel Baker affirms? By ne means. Mr, Francis Galton not only agrees with Mr. Wallace, but maintams that the peril in which they live is a source of pleasure. 2... “Prince Kronotkin points ont the enormous exaggeration of the ‘tooth and claw’ view of nature. The Prince refers to the families of elephants, rhinoceroses, and the numberless societies of monkeys to be found in the lower latitudes of Asia and Africa; the numberless herds of reindeer in the far North, the herds of musk-oxen and the innumerable bands of polar foxes still farther north; the flocks of seals and morses and sociable cetaceans which inhabit the ocean; the herds of wild horses, donkeys, camels and sheep which range the steppes of Central Asia. He says: “How trifling, in comparison with them, are the numbers of carnivora; And how false, therefore, is the view of those who speak of the animal world as if nothing were to be seen in it but Hons and hyenas plunging their bleeding teeth into the flesh of the victims! On might as well imagine that the whole of human life is nothing but a succession of Tel-el Kebir and Geok Tepe massacres.’ “Unless, then, death is an inexcusable incident in animal life, it would seem that the terror of death to be inflicted by the carnivora is really a figment of the imagination; and one might reasonably adopt the language of Mr. Wallace, that ‘the supposed torments and miseries of animals have little real existence, but are the reflection of the imagined sensations of cultivated men and women in similar circumstances, and that the amount of actual suffering caused by the struggle for existence among animals ig altogether insignificant.’ ” Mr. Hirst does not, of course, deny that there is a good deal of exiting and being eaten in the animal kingdom. This however, he says, is not cruelty, and he devotes much space to showing that in their attacks wild creatures cause their victims little pain, altho he does not go so far as to say that the mangled ones enjov it, as Wallace maintained of the fleeing antelope. The familiar case of Dr. Livingstone, on whom a lion’s jaw crunching through his shoulder acted as an anesthetie, is of course cited, and supported by much evidence along the same line. The reviewer regards the case as having been made out, and concludes as follows: “So then, as the result of this most interesting investigation, we may reasonably come to the conclusion that nature is by no means the system of terrorism that Sir Samuel Baker makes it out to be; that it does not justify the pessimistic and almost atheistic conclusions of Mr. J. 8S. Mill, and that it is not the horrible commingling of devourers and devoured that a superexcited imagination is predisposed to paint it. On the contrary, we may believe that the various carnivorous enemies of the gentler races of animals are much more serviceable in training them to the finest exercise of skill and fleetness than they are destructive of their numbers or oppressively noxious to their happiness of animal life, and that in a world in which death is necessary. death bv the assault of carnivorous enemies is no more dreadful but is. in fact, much Jess painful, than many other methods by which life mav be extinguished.”—IJnterary Digest. The above is in full accord with our presentation on the subject in our issue of June 1, page 165; which please note again. [2726]
This website uses cookies to improve the website and your experience. By continuing to browse this website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. If you require further information or do not wish to accept cookies when using this website, please visit our Privacy PolicyTerms of Use.