Jury 15, 1904 have five volumes of MILLENNIAL Dawn, and there are no books in the world like them! They are just what we need!” This so surprised and delighted our neighbor—to think that she had found some who held to our belief—that she could hardly wait until she reached home to tell us about it. “Why,” she said, “I invited them right over to your house, and told them that a man [meaning Bro. Samson] was to be at your house, and that they should come out to the meetings.” Vout. XXV ZION’S WATCH TOWER ALLEGHENY, PA., AUGUST 1, 1904 (227-228) This incident has encouraged us that our labors are not in vain in the Lord; and another thing it has demonstrated to me ane the Lord uses various agents in gathering together his elect. I have been myself greatly blessed giving out the healthful food. May the dear Lord grant us grace to continue in his service to the end. Jos. CoocH,—Indiana, No. 15 VIEWS FROM THE WATCH TOWER MIXING WORLDLINESS AND GODLINESS The secular press informs the world that recently The Pastime Club of Knightsville, Ind., was opened by prayer by the pastor of the Methodist Church of that place—as a compromise with the young folks who were members of his church and also of the club. The pastor and older members attended the dance to see that the “fun” did not go too far, and to stop it if it did. “There was no interruption.” Three days later, in the basement of St. Paul’s Episcopal church, Toledo, Ohio, a different kind of “fun” was witnessed. The press account says:— “The participants were Clark Crawford and Edward Gendon, two local boxers of some note, and the affair was given under the direction of the Young Men’s Club of the church. William Parker acted as referee and declared the fight a draw at the end of the third round, but it was in fact ‘a fight to a finish,’ as neither one of the fighters would have been able to have finished the bout. While the authorities of the church had given their consent to an athletic entertainment, they were surprised this afternoon to learn that the fight had been the fiercest ever held in Toledo. Another six-round bout was given, aside from two wrestling matches.” * * * We mention these matters, not by way of intimating that no godly people remain in these churches, nor in the denominations which they represent, but as illustrations of the misconception of what a church is and what its mission in the world is. Under the impression that eternal torment is the future portion of all not in some manner connected with “some church,” goodness of heart, benevolence, constantly suggests greater and greater compromises to secure the interest and attendance of young men and women. To get the unconverted interested at all requires worldly attractions, and hence every concession is made that conscience will allow, and some that it does not approve but “winks at.” The lack of a knowledge of God’s great plan for the world’s salvation, and of his separate and distinct plan for the seleetion and salvation of the “little flock,” the church, first, has warped all judgment, and is rapidly devitalizing all the denominations of Christendom. Should we labor to combat these worldly tendencies? No, it would be useless: it is the logical result of the errors of doctrine. The whole system—“Christendom”—is full of worldlings: many of them very mora] and respectable, but thoroughly unregenerate, unconverted,—ignorant of the principles of Christianity and inclined to regard the few “saints” as fanatics, The divine plan is the one we should follow—the one with which we should codperate. God declares that “Christendom,” “Babylon,” is rejected and now calls on all who are Israelites indeed, “Come out of her. my people. that ye he not partakers of her sins and receive not of her plagues.”—Rev. 18:3. THE VANISHING SENSE OF SIN Evolution doctrines and “higher criticism” of the Bible have for years been gradually impressing upon the people that there was no original sin in Eden—no fall from righteousness into the horrible pit and miry clay of sin. Their teaching is that men were at first close akin to monkevs and have been grandly climbing upward. This seed is bringing forth fruitage throughout Christendom, and especially amongst the more intelligent. Let us quote the words of Rev. R. F. Coyle at the freneral Assembly of the Presbyterian church, recently held in Buffalo, N. Y. He said:— “Not only are they largely alienated from the church, but from alienation they have passed to animosity. Next to this, one can but note the drift of the people in general away from lofty ideals. It is something that should give us pause when conservative journals and conservative public men are constrained to characterize this as an ‘age of graft.’ Warnings have recently sounded out from both pulpit and bench against the money madness of our times. The President of the United States, in view of the public land frauds and postal pecula tions, has been forced to say, ‘ “Government of the people, by the people, and for the people” will perish from the earth if bribery is tolerated.’ A distinguished prelate of the Roman Catholic church declares that of all our sins as a people that of dishonesty is most pronounced. “Linked to this (the fading out of conviction), its fruitage indeed is the vanishing sense of sin. It is winked at and glossed over and condoned. There are no sinners any longer, and especially in the high places of respectability. If there are any lost people, they are down in the slums.” * * * Another matter which assists in the causing of a realization of sin to vanish from the public conscience is the fact that the creeds unscripturally uphold the thought that the wages of sin is eternal torment. And since the meanest specimens of humanity are instinctively recognized as too good for such a fate, the only rational course left is to depict as sin only the most brutal conduct. Thus does error act and react injuriously, lowering the moral standard, universally and increasingly. Only the truth sanctifies. “Sanctify them through thy truth,” was our Master’s prayer. THE DIFFERENCE AND THE REASON FOR IT Four Protestant ministers—D. D.’s—recently participated in the dedication of a Jewish synagogue at Columbus, Ohio. All of them made felicitous remarks. One of them, Dr. Lewis, amongst other things, said: “He believed that all creeds should strive together for the abolition of atheism and idolatry. The combination would be invincible. In the past the Jewish creed was strong for the right; in the future it would be strong for the right in union with the religions that were followers of Jesus Christ.” Such utter blindness to the fundamentals of Christianity is truly lamentable. The essence of this statement is that any kind ot religion will do except idolatry. And yet every one of these gentlemen would oppose the real gospel message of the Bible, whose foundation is the “ransom for all” and an opportunity for every child of Adam to learn of the only name given under heaven and among men whereby we must be saved. Every one of them would denounce Mr1tLENNIAL Dawn, Why? Because they are blinded by error; because “the darkness hateth the light.” A CHINESE VIEW OF CHRISTIAN CIVILIZATION “A remarkably keen and trenchantly written characterization of Western civilization from an Oriental point of view has been published in a little book entitled, ‘Letters from a Chinese Official’ (McClure, Phillips). While originally written for an English hearing, the significance of these letters (the anonymous author believes) ‘should appeal with a peculiar force to Americans.’ Their interest, he says, and justly, depends, ‘not upon topical allusions, but upon the whole contrast suggested between Eastern and Western ideals. And America, in a preéminent degree, is representative of the West. ... What is at stake in the development of the American republic is nothing less than the success or failure of Western civilization.’ “It is not flattering to Occidentals, the comparison drawn between the two civilizations by this Chinaman, who contends that Eastern ‘profound mistrust and dislike’ of Western ideals are based upon reason. The antiquity of Asiatic civilization, he says, has given a stability to its institutions not found in the West,—it ‘embodies a moral order, while in yours we detect only an economic chaos.’ ‘You profess Christianity, but your civilization has never been Christian; whereas ours is Confucian through and through. ... Among you, no one is contented, no one has leisure to live, so intent are all on increasing the means of living. .. . We of the East measure the degree of civilization, not by accumulation of the means of living, but by the character and value of the life lived. ... And we would not if we could rival you in your wealth, your sciences and your arts if we must do 80 at the cost of imitating £3403]
This website uses cookies to improve the website and your experience. By continuing to browse this website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. If you require further information or do not wish to accept cookies when using this website, please visit our Privacy PolicyTerms of Use.