(239-243) all who lost it through Adam’s transgression, and therefore guaranteed a restoration to perfect and everlasting life to every man? Answer—Very few Universalists of this kind are to be found. Generally, they either directly or indirectly deny the Ransom—deny that Christ’s death purchased everlasting life for anybody. Their theory generally rests upon the assumption that there was no divine sentence to be met; that divine mercy could exercise itself without meeting the demands of divine justice; that our Lord Jesus died, not to purchase us, not to pay the ransom price, not to redeem us, not as a substitute for Adam, but merely, they say, as an example to us of full obedience to righteousness, even at the cost of life. To such we answer that if Jesus was merely our example, and not our Redeemer, then our only hope would be to keep his example to such an extent that we would be individually pleasing to the Father as he was; and this would mean that we must keep the whole law blameless as he did. Those who understand this proposition must see clearly that, if that be true, there is no hope for any of us, for, as the Apostle declares, “By the deeds of the law shall no flesh be justified in God’sesight.” Christ was justified by the deeds of the law, but perfect deeds were possible to him, because he was born holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners. Perfect deeds, perfect fulfilment of the divine requirements, are absolutely impossible for us who were born in sin, shapen in iniquity. If, therefore, Jesus be merely our pattern, our exemplar, and not also our Redeemer, we are of all men most miserable, for seeing salvation we shall be wholly unable to attain it. Our whole hope is in the declaration of the Lord’s Word that the righteousness of Christ is imputed to us, that his death was to meet the penalty against us as a race—for Adam’s sins and ours. Our hope is that, being covered by faith with the robe of his righteousness, our imperfect. attempts to follow his example in obedience to the Father’s will will be accounted as though they were perfect—“through the merit of him who loved us and bought us with his own precious blood.” But if there be Universalists who take the position implied in this question, our answer would be as heretofore, that Christ’s death did purchase lasting life for all who lost it through Adam’s transgression. and that God has guaranteed a full restoration of ali that was lost “to every soul of man that believeth”—in the Scriptural sense of obedient believing. Nothing in this implies that they will get all these things at the moment of their awakening from the tomb. At that time they will get a beginning of perfect life if they are obedient to the voice of the great Physician, which will eventuate in their absolute perfection in the close of that Millennial day. Our Lord, describing the matter in John 5:29, declares that the dead will come forth unto a resurrection by judgment. They will come forth from the tomb, from oblivion, to physica] conditions somewhat similar to those enjoyed before they died, with surroundings in every way much more advantageous; with Satan bound that he can deceive them no more; with the good ZION’S WATCH TOWER ALLEGHENY, Pa. influences of righteousness and truth let loose in the world to such an extent that ultimately the knowledge of the Lord shall fill the whole earth; with judges and law givers under the supervision of the royal priesthood to look after their best interests, to reprove and correct and chastise their failures, and to encourage, reward and bless their endeavors, and thus, by judgments, of rewards and punishments, they would be gradually brought up step by step, up, up, up to the highway of holiness, to the absolute perfection at the farther end, which the Lord is pleased to grant to all who will have it upon these his terms, obedience to his Son. “But it shall come to paag that the soul that will not hear [to obey] that Prophet shall be cut off’—in the second death, from which there will be no redemption and no recovery. THE SPIRIT AND BRIDE SAY COME Question.—When will the spirit and the bride say, Come? —Rev. 22:17. Answer.—This will be fulfilled in the future for several reasons: (1) There is no “bride” now. The church, the “little flock,” is now the “chaste virgin” “espoused” to the Lord. She will be the bride at marriage, and for long centuries she has been looking forward to that great event at the close of this Gospel age. (2) The context refers to the river of the water of life of verses 1 and 2 of the same chapter. There is no such river now, nor will there be until the establishment of the kingdom; for this is the picture: the New Jerusalem (the church in glory, the kingdom) comes down from God out of heaven, adorned “as a bride” and then from its throne will proceed the “river of the water of life” of which all may drink freely, and to which the spirit and the bride will invite all. Now the prospective members of the bride class have the Lord’s spirit in them, “a well of water springing up unto everlasting lite.”— John 4:14, By and by these well-springs brought together in glory with the Lord shall constitute the source of the great river of life which shall bless and heal all the nations. “In thy seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed.” (Gal. 3:29) By and by the prophecy will be fulfilled: “He that believeth in me, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.” (3) Now the call is a different one and is not open to mankind. Our Lord declared, “No man can come unto me except the Father which sent me draw him.” The Apostle declares that now many are blinded by the adversary and hence could not see even if there were a river of life flowing, and could not hear even if there were a bride to say, Come. HE SHALL ‘‘POUR OUT HIS SPIRIT UPON ALL FLESH’’ Question.—Does Joel’s prophecy concerning the pouring out of the Lord’s “spirit upon all flesh,” apply to the present or to the future age? Answer.—It applies to the coming age—the Millennium. God is now pouring out his spirit only upon the church—“his servants and hand-maidens.” See MILLENNIAL Dawn, Vol. 6, page 179. Vou. XXV ALLEGHENY, PA., AUGUST 15, 1904 No. 16 VIEWS FROM THE WATCH TOWER DISBELIEF IN A FUTURE LIFE DANGEROUS Professor Goldwin Smith notes the fact that the tendency of our times is to destroy faith in a future life, or, as the Professor states it, faith in immortality. (We need not quarrel over terms, especially when the Professor’s use of the word immortality, though less exact than our own, is the usual}, the customary one in our day. In his use of this word, he is in accord with the teachings of the Scripture, that God has provided a future life, through a resurrection, for every member of Adam’s race.) We give extracts from his article, which was published in The North American Review, as follows: “It would seem that we have come practically to a point at which—evolution and the higher criticism having between them done the work of demolition, and the work of reconstruction, if it is ever to be done, being still in the future—no small part of educated mankind has renounced or is gradually renouncing the hope of a future life and acting on the belief that death ends all. “A general contraction of views to the man’s own life must apparently be the consequence of the conviction that this life is all. A man of sense will probably be inclined to let reforms alone, and to consider how he may best go through the brief journey of life with comfort, if possible with enjoyment to himself and in pleasant intercourse with his fellowmen. High social or political aspirations, or high aspirations of any kind, will hardly survive the disillusion. “We have an interest in our own children. But otherwise what interest have we in the generations that are to come after us on which a religion of humanity can be founded? It is not a very lively interest that we feel even in the remoter members of the human race, to say nothing of those in the next street. Yet these exist; and of their existence we are conscious, and are reminded by the electric cable. Of the existence of future generations, supposing there is no future life, we shall not be conscious, and, therefore, for us thev will not exist. We cannot even say with absolute certainty that they will exist at all. The end of man’s dwelling-place, and, therefore, of all human progress, science tells us, will be a physical catastrophe; and there are even those who seem to think that this catastrophe may be forestalled by a recurrence of the glacial era. Natural law. which science bids us venerate, departs. it must be remembered, with the lawgiver. Nothing remains but physical forces without a guiding mind, the play of which it is impossible to forecast. As to posthumous fame, it would be an arrant delusion, even if one man in a million could hope to obtain it. “Whatever conduces to the enjoyment and prolongation of this life will probably be sought more energetically than before. Material progress, therefore, may quicken its pace. Nor is it likely that men will be quite so ready as they are now to throw away their lives in war. At present the soldier in facing [3410]
This website uses cookies to improve the website and your experience. By continuing to browse this website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. If you require further information or do not wish to accept cookies when using this website, please visit our Privacy PolicyTerms of Use.