(255-259) those grand ancient worthies were not called to be members of the Bride class. “Justification by faith’* throughout this Gospel age is merely the first step in the ways of the Lord, now opened to whosoever hath an ear to hear. The second step is consecration, a full surrender of our all to the Lord. We may safely conclude that all who took the first step were welcome to take the second one, and that it would appear the “reasonable service” to all sincere ones who properly appreciated God’s mercy an forgiving their sins. Those not thus influenced usually found their faith grow as cold and lifeless as their love, and thus losing their faith were without justification again—part of the unjustified world. Whoever of the justified were of the right spirit and made eonsecration of their all during the period of the call, were of the “called ones” mentioned by the Apostle and urged to make their calling and election sure by obedience to their covenant. This same class now, since the end of the “call,” are not thus called, but are in a watting attitude. Knowing from the Scriptures that “many are called but few chosen,” they are waiting for an opportunity to take places amongst the “called” as substitutes for some not found worthy. It would not be unreasonable to suppose that there are nundreds in just such a waiting condition, although the pres~"* See issue Oct. 15, 1911, p. 394, “Justification by Faith.” VoL. XXV ZION’S WATCH TOWER ALLEGHENY, PA., SEPTEMBER 1, 1904 ALLEGHENY, Pa. ent-day preaching is not very favorable to either justification or consecration: justification through faith in the ransom-sacrifice of Jesus, the only kind, is little understood or taught. On the other hand there are doubtless thousands in all the denominations of Christendom who have taken both steps (justification and consecration) who are overcharged with cares of this life and whose periods of opportunity gradually expiring leave places for those who seek and pray and hunger to enter into the favor of the “called” class. Wo have no positive means of knowing who are thus aceepted as substitutes, but we think it reasonable to consider three conditions as indicative of such aeceptance. (1) A growth in the fruits of the spirit. (2) Activity in serving the Truth to the extent of talents and opportunities. (3) An ability to grasp prominent features of the Truth with considerable clearness. The question then arises, What about justified believers who have consecrated and who may never find a chance as substitutes? We incline to consider these to be few,—that the Lord will give the hearing ear to comparatively few except as there may be an opening for them. However, if any of said elass do fail of an opportunity to become substitutes we would be sure that divine love and care would be over them just as surely, and that failing a place in the elect church through no fault of theirs, these would be given some good portion which would much more than reward and satisfy them. No. 17 VIEWS FROM THE WATCH TOWER BISHOP POTTER AND THE SALOON Bishop Potter, of the Episcopal Diocese of New York, has created quite a commotion in all circles by giving his aanction to a newly-opened “tavern” in New York City. The saloon and cafe are described as having fine appointments: in one end is a soda fountain at which beer is sold for the accommodation especially of ladies, who are not admitted to the saloon proper, at the bar of which liquors of all kinds are dispensed with free lunch at noon. Of the enterprise, the New York Sun, after recounting Bishop Potter’s address and his leading in the singing of the doxology to the tune of “Old Hundred,” says: ‘The idea of the tavern originated in the mind of Joseph Johnson, Jr., the Greek Oak of the Order of Acorns. Mr. Johnson has always believed that rum is a curse, but he holds that the evils of intemperance must be combated by practical men and not theorists. If there must be saloons he wants them to be as ethical as possible. So he organized the Subway Tavern Company with a capital of $10,000—subscribed by prominent men whose names are given, The managers of the company have decided that not more than five per cent shall be paid as dividends on the stock, whatever the profits be: the surplus is to be used in starting other similar taverns.” We have no doubt that the gentlemen connected with this innovation have benevolent intentions: Their thought evidently is to fight fire with fire; to fight the doggerel saloon with a hetter one, to furnish purer liquors and better surroundings. We believe that they are making a great mistake. Nevertheless, the affair shows the extremity to which well-intentioned people are driven by present conditions, that the Apostle calls “the present distress.” How evident to the instructed Christian that the one thing needful is the establishment of the kingdom of God, for which we pray, “Thy kingdom come, thy will be done on earth as it is done in heaven.” Nothing short of this heavenly power can cope with the present downward tendencies that afflict the whole human family, the “groaning creation.” These gentlemen in New York City are copying a plan adopted a few years ago in Great Britain by some of the Episcopal clergy there. These established taverns where liquors of all kinds were obtainable, as well as “soft drinks,” the latter being given the preference in that the bartender is paid a commission on the soft drinks, making nothing on the intoxicating liquors. The effect has been good in Great Britain, it is claimed. Nevertheless we have no such expectations in respect to the introduction of this system into this country. Conditions here are totally different. Here the majority are opposed to liquor drinking, and the business and all things associated with it are more or less tabooed, and thus many are protected from the degrading influences, We fear that the tendency will be to break down this barrier and to make drinking more general and more fashionable, and thus to increase the evil effects of this most terribly degrading practice. Bishop Potter’s course has brought upon him very severe criticism from many quarters: yet it will make him popular with a certain very respectable class. The chief difficulty seems to lie in the fact that the true church is not understood and its rules do not fit when applied to the world and its wisdom. Recognizing the church as the “little flock” of “saints” fully consecrated to the Lord, we do not suppose for one moment that Bishop Potter would claim to be a member of it nor to be bound by its precepts and ideals. But many others, who take the same unsanctified stand, and who patronize saloons of the worst class, are chiding the Bishop, rebuking him, because they think of him as one of the “saints,” and perceive that his course is not up to the ideals of the New Testament for such. The sooner the world realizes the truth on this subject the better it will be for all concerned: that fully ninetynine per cent of the nominal church (preachers included) are merely well-intentioned worldlings, who have never consecrated their wills, never been begotten of the Spirit and have not, therefore, “the mind [spirit] of Christ.” DANGER FROM ‘‘HIGHER CRITICISM’’ Dr. David J. Burrell, pastor of the Marble Church, Fifth avenue, New York, says:— ‘It is indeed true that there is sore danger from this critical movement, but it is not the Bible that stands so much in danger—it can take care of itseli—as it is the dictionary that is assailed. “Words that have a specific and clear meaning to us, used by the exponents of the critical propaganda, have a different meaning entirely. It is one of the calamitous consequences of this criticism. It means a complete overturning of definitions as we understand them. And to coin a spurious word is worse than to issue a spurious coin. “Men preach from the pulpit and talk with you and me about the inspiration. Their terms to them have not the dictionary definition which they know you put on them. I won’t mince words, for I know friends of mine who do this. It’s not honest. We are fighting for Webster’s and Worcester’s dictionaries, just as we are fighting for God Almighty in this contest. “There are men preaching the gospel of Christ who do not know what the little word “is” means, using it instead in the most outre and outlandish way. I know a man who will say ‘The Bible is the Word of God,’ yet he doesn’t mean what people think him to mean. ‘Is’ to him means ‘is not.’ “In days of old, when the gods of the Pantheon had lost their powers, the priests laughed to themselves before the altar as they went through the ceremonies. That is an effect, too, on the Christian ministry of the higher criticism. “I make no charge against any man, and I say it with a deal of charity and lamentation, but some men in some pulpits are smiling at the words they have to preach. “I walked with a man from a church one day—he being a friend of mine, though he is one of the critical ones—at the close of a sermon he had preached on the incarnation. He had hardly gone a hundred steps from his pulpit when he Collegiate [3418]
This website uses cookies to improve the website and your experience. By continuing to browse this website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. If you require further information or do not wish to accept cookies when using this website, please visit our Privacy PolicyTerms of Use.