7
1
7
download/literature/watchtower/1906-23.pdf
../literature/watchtower/1906/23/1906-23-1.html
VOL.
XXVII
ALLEGHENY,
PA.,
DECEMBER
1,
1906
VIEWS
FROM
THE
WATCH
TOWER
No.
23
SOCIALISM
MENACING
GREAT
BRITAIN
The
Liberal
Party
in
the
present
House
of
Commons
stands
committed
to
a
considerable
degree
to
the
laboring
class
indeed
quite
a
few
of
its
members
were
chosen
on
the
Labor
ticket.
British
statesmen
have
been
wondering
to
what
extent
this
new
element
in
their
politics
will
affect
future
legislation,
wondering
how
conservatIVe
or
otherwise
the
new
members
from
the
lower
strata
of
society
would
prove
to
be.
Hereto
fore
the
members
have
generally
been
chosen
either
from
the
aristocratic
or
wealthy
class,
or
from
the
middle
class
of
merchants,
lawyers,
etc.,
who
have
a
great
respect
for
tradi
tions.
It
is
causing
quite
an
awakening
amongst
the
British
to
find
that
the
new
members
representing
the
working
classes
are
by
no
means
disposed
to
be
conservative,
but
rather
are
laying
their
plans
for
the
ultimate
capture
of
the
majority
in
Parliament-planning
also
something
of
a
socialistic
turn
to
legislation.
Thus,
in
their
due
time,
matters
are
shaping
around
for
the
termination
of
Gentile
rule
in
anarchy
by
the
appointed
time--by
October,
1914,
when
their
lease
or
permit
will
expire.
We
quote
the
following
from
the
pen
of
an
Eng.
lish
writer
who
evidently
is
well
posted
on
his
subject.
He
says:-
"The
enormous
majority
secured
by
the
Liberal
party
in
the
last
British
parliamentary
elections
had
its
embarrass·
ments
as
well
as
its
pleasant
features
...•
A
section
of
the
Labor
party
in
parliament,
composing
about
one-half
the
labor
vote,
is
socialistic
in
its
program
and
principles,
and
has
been
striving
vigorously
to
whip
into
line
with
itself
the
other
half
by
seeking
to
get
control
of
the
trades
unions
to
which
the
conservative
half
owes
and
confesses
allegiance.
This
movement
has
become
so
successful
that
the
leaders
of
the
Liberal
party,
especially
the
Scotch,
became
alarmed
at
the
growth
of
Socialism
in
the
labor
end
of
the
party,
and
have
recently
taken
steps
to
warn
the
Government
that
any
further
encouragement
of
the
socialistic
element
would
result
in
seri
ous
trouble.
Alexander
Murray,
the
Liberal
Scottish
whip
in
the
House
of
Commons,
in
a
recent
speech
made
a
fierce
attack
upon
Socialism
and
its
representatives
in
Parliament.
The
Scottish
Parliamentary
Association,
under
Mr.
Murray's
influ
ence,
passed
a
resolution
that
'it
is
the
primary
duty
of
the
Liberal
party
to
present
strenuous
opposition
to
all
candidatea
who
are
not
prepared
to
dissociate
themselves
with
the
So
cialist
party,
the
avowed
object
of
which
is
the
complete
de·
struction
of
those
principles
of
individual
liberty
for
which
Liberalism
has
always
contended.'
,
'In
the
meantime,
the
Labor
representation
committee,
whose
chairman
is
Keir
Hardie,
and
which
is
the
controlling
body
of
the
Socialistic
element
in
politics,
is
working
with
might
and
main
among
the
unions
to
bring
them
over
body
and
soul
to
Socialism,
with
which
they
are
all
more
or
less
deeply
leavened,
and
seems
to
be
in
the
way
of
fully
suc
ceeding.
This
presages
a
cleavage
between
the
whole
Labor
vote
and
the
Government."
STRONG
WORDS
IN
THE
HOUSE
OF
LORDS
"It
is
strange
that
the
strong,
impressive
words
spoken
by
Lord
Avebury
in
the
House
of
Lords
last
week
should
have
failed,
as
they
have,
to
excite
international
discussion.
Lord
Avebury
said:
"
'The
unrest
of
Europe,
the
spread
of
Socialism
and
the
ominous
rise
of
anarchism
are
warnings
to
the
governments
and
the
ruling
classes
that
the
condition
of
the
working
classes
in
Europe
is
becoming
intolerable,
and
that
if
a
revolution
is
to
be
avoided
some
steps
must
be
taken
to
increase
wages,
reduce
the
hours
of
labor
and
lower
the
prices
of
the
neces
saries
of
life.
Europe
is
a
great
military
camp.
We
have
no
peace,
only
an
armistice,
with
unlimited
expenditures.
The
result
is
that
instead
of
accumulating
capital
for
our
children
we
are
piling
up
for
them
debt
and
overwhelming
responsi
bilities.
'
"These
words
were
spoken,
not
by
a
labor
agitator
or
a
Socialist,
but
by
an
aristocrat
and
a
member
of
the
most
con
servative
body
in
all
Europe.
That
gives
them
all
the
more
significance.
They
contain
more
valuable
political
economy
than
is
to
be
found
in
most
of
the
books.
They
sound
a
note
of
warning.
Take
heed,
gentlemen
of
the
war
and
navy
de
partmentsl
"-Wall
Street
JO'Urnal.
•
•
•
The
matter
that
confuses
many
is
that
really
the
working
people
of
the
civilized
world
are
better
off
in
many
respects
today
than
they
ever
were
before:
the
unrest
is
the
result
of
knowledge,
the
increase
of
the
spirit
of
liberty.
When
the
people
supposed
that
God
had
created
the
royal
families
to
rule
and
had
specially
blessed
them
financially,
they
looked
to
them
as
they
properly
looked
to
the
Almighty,
as
their
bene
factors,
and
were
thankful
for
whatever
they
received,
thank
ful
to
be
permitted
to
live
at
all,
thankful
to
have
enough
of
food
and
raiment
and
shelter
to
make
them
reasonably
com
fortable.
But
with
the
opening
of
the
eyes
of
their
under
standing,
with
the
information
from
the
pages
of
history
that
their
kings
and
nobles
in
times
past
had
seized
the
property
and
power
which
they
now
possessed-seized
it
by
force
and
without
divine
authorization-this
knowledge
has
rendered
the
masses
dissatisfied.
They
now
reason
that
those
who
have
seized
the
earth
and
its
honors,
authorities
and
powers
in
the
past
and
who
hold
them
by
force
may
be
reasonably
required
to
surrender
to
the
public
enough
of
their
surplus
to
make
the
entire
people
reasonably
comfortable.
Nor
need
we
be
sur
prised
that
frequently
unreasonable
demands
are
made
by
those
whose
minds
have
not
been
developed
along
the
lines
of
finance,
politics
and
religion,
but
who
are
coming
to
these
subjects
with
crude,
half-formed
impressions,
surmises,
ex
pectations.
Is
not
this
exactly
what
the
Scriptures
tell
us
respecting
our
day,
the"
time
of
the
end
"-in
which
we
have
already
been
for
one
hundred
and
seven
years'
Do
they
not
tell
us
that
in
this
period
would
come
the
running
to
and
fro
of
travel,
which
we
now
see
about
us
everywhere,
by
which
the
various
nations
and
peoples
and
classes
are
inter
mingled
and
waked
up
to
the
true
situation
of
matters'
Do
we
not
see
about
us
as
another
evidence
of
this
time
the
ful
filment
of
the
prediction,
"Knowledge
shall
be
increased'"
And
is
it
not
as
a
result
of
the
increase
of
knowledge
from
this
intermingling
that
the
further
prediction
is
to
be
ful
filled,
"There
shall
be
a
time
of
trouble
such
as
was
not
since
there
was
a
nation
"
'-Daniel
12:
1.
HEATHEN
NEW
ENGLAND
Rev.
Dr.
Hoar,
of
the
Newton
Theological
Seminary,
has
been
making
a
study
of
conditions
in
New
England,
and
finally
raises
his
voice
in
protest
that
instead
of
civilization
elevating
the
people
a
marked
degeneracy
is
in
progress.
This
may
be
disappointing
to
those
who
have
the
wrong
expectation
for
the
future--to
those
who
are
hoping
that
the
Millennium
will
be
introduced
by
the
conversion,
sanctification,
of
the
whole
world
of
mankind
to
the
extent
that
God's
will
shall
be
done
on
earth
as
it
is
done
in
heaven.
But
for
those
who
take
the
Scriptural
view,
Reverend
Hoar's
findings
are
a
further
cor
roboration
of
the
truth
of
the
Bible.
Our
Lord's
words
are
confirmed,
for
he
said,
"When
the
Son
of
man
cometh
shall
he
find
the
faith
on
earth"
'-implying
that
the
true
faith
would
be
very
scarce
at
that
time.
It
confirms
the
Apostle
Paul's
statement
that
"evil
men
and
seducers
shall
wax
worse
and
worse,
deceivin¥
and
being
deceived";
and
again,
that
"In
the
last
days
[m
the
close
of
the
p'resent
age,
before
the
dawning
of
the
new
dispensation]
perIlous
times
shall
come.
For
men
shall
be
lovers
of
their
own
selves,
covetous,
boasters,
proud,
blasphemers,
disobedient
to
parents,
unthankful,
unholy,
without
natural
affection,
truce
breakers,
false
accusers,
incon·
tinent,
fierce,
despisers
of
those
that
are
good,
traitors,
heady,
highminded,
lovers
of
pleasure
more
than
lovers
of
God;
hav
ing
a
form
of
godliness,
but
denying
the
power
thereof."
2
Tim.
3:1-5.
Reverend
Hoar
says
:-"
There
has
come
to
some
com
munities
a
disintegration
and
degeneration
of
public
morals
which
has
brought
them
down
in
moral
tone
below
the
mining
camps
of
the
west.
Degenerates
in
mining
camps
are
willing
to
acknowledge
that
they
are
bad,
but
not
so
with
degenerates
in
New
England.
They
commit
the
sins
of
the
mining
camps
while
they
lay
claim
to
respectability,
and
refuse
to
admit
their
guilt.
There
must
be
a
mixture
of
wickedness
in
order
to
free
them
from
a
charge
of
being
Puritanical.
In
90
per
cent.
of
the
New
England
towns
the
large
majority
of
the
people
have
no
intelligent
faith
about
anything,
and
do
not
wish
to
have
any.
Serious
religion,
which
interferes
with
per
sonal
aims
and
pleasures,
is
shunned
and
its
advocates
ridi
culed.
The
condition
seems
utterly
hopeless."
RESTATEMENT
OF
METHODIST
FAITH
Considerable
agitation
has
been
caused
amongst
our
Metho
dist
friends
looking
toward
a
revieed
statement
of
their
creed;
but,
says
the
Michigan
Christian
Advocate,
commenting
on
the
question,
"Present
indications
are
that
no
revision
of
the.
Methodist
creed
will
be
undertaken
in
this
generation."
The
Methodist
Times
(London)
admits
that
honesty
seems
to
call
for
a
revision,
but
claims
that
expediency
frowns
upon
it.
It
says:-
"Theoretically
a
great
deal
might
be
said
in
favor
of
the
[3898]
Vou. XXVIT ALLEGHENY, PA., DECEMBER 1, 1906 No. 23 VIEWS FROM THE WATCH TOWER SOCIALISM MENACING GREAT BRITAIN The Liberal Party in the present House of Commons stands committed to a considerable degree to the laboring class— indeed quite a few of its members were chosen on the Labor ticket. British statesmen have been wondering to what extent this new element in their politics will affect future legislation, wondering how conservative or otherwise the new members from the lower strata of society would prove to be. Heretofore the members have generally been chosen either from the aristocratic or wealthy class, or from the middle class of merchants, lawyers, etc., who have a great respect for traditions, It is causing quite an awakening amongst the British to find that the new members representing the working classes are by no means disposed to be conservative, but rather are laying their plans for the ultimate capture of the majority in Parliament—planning also something of a socialistic turn to legislation. Thus, in their due time, matters are shaping around for the termination of Gentile rule in anarchy by the appointed time—by October, 1914, when their lease or permit will expire. We quote the following from the pen of an English writer who evidently is well posted on his subject. He says:— ‘«The enormous majority secured by the Liberal party in the last British parliamentary elections had its embarrassments as well as its pleasant features.... A section of the Labor party in parliament, composing about one-half the labor vote, is socialistic in its program and principles, and has been striving vigorously to whip into line with itself the other half by seeking to get control of the trades unions to which the conservative half owes and confesses allegiance. This movement has become so successful that the leaders of the Liberal party, especially the Scotch, became alarmed at the growth of Socialism in the labor end of the party, and have recently taken steps to warn the Government that any further encouragement of the socialistic element would result in serious trouble. Alexander Murray, the Liberal Scottish whip in the House of Commons, in a recent speech made a fierce attack upon Socialism and its representatives in Parliament. The Scottish Parliamentary Association, under Mr. Murray’s influence, passed a resolution that ‘it is the primary duty of the Liberal party to present strenuous opposition to all candidates who are not prepared to dissociate themselves with the Socialist party, the avowed object of which is the complete destruction of those principles of individual liberty for which Liberalism has always contended.’ ‘In the meantime, the Labor representation committee, whose chairman is Keir Hardie, and which is the controlling body of the Socialistie element in politics, is working with might and main among the unions to bring them over body and soul to Socialism, with which they are all more or less deeply leavened, and seems to be in the way of fully sueceeding. This presages a cleavage between the whole Labor vote and the Government.’’ STRONG WORDS IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS “Tt is strange that the strong, impressive words spoken by Lord Avebury in the House of Lords last week should have failed, as they have, to excite international discussion. Lord Avebury said: ‘¢¢The unrest of Europe, the spread of Socialism and the ominous rise of anarchism are warnings to the governments and the ruling classes that the condition of the working classes in Europe is becoming intolerable, and that if a revolution is to be avoided some steps must be taken to increase wages, reduce the hours of labor and lower the prices of the necessaries of life. Europe is a great military camp. We have no peace, only an armistice, with unlimited expenditures. The result is that instead of accumulating capital for our children we are piling up for them debt and overwhelming responsibilities. ’ ‘‘These words were spoken, not by a labor agitator or a Socialist, but by an aristocrat and a member of the most conservative body in all Europe. That gives them all the more significance. They contain more valuable political economy than is to be found in most of the books. They sound a note of warning. Take heed, gentlemen of the war and navy departments! ’’—Wall Street Journal. * * The matter that confuses many is that really the working people of the civilized world are better off in many respects today than they ever were before: the unrest is the result of knowledge, the increase of the spirit of liberty. When the people supposed that God had created the royal families to (371-372) rule and had specially blessed them financially, they looked to them as they properly looked to the Almighty, as their benefactors, and were thankful for whatever they received, thankful to be permitted to live at all, thankful to have enough of food and raiment and shelter to make them reasonably comfortable. But with the opening of the eyes of their understanding, with the information from the pages of history that their kings and nobles in times past had seized the property and power which they now possessed—seized it by force and without divine authorization—this knowledge has rendered the masses dissatisfied. They now reasén that those who have seized the earth and its honors, authorities and powers in the past and who hold them by force may be reasonably required to surrender to the public enough of their surplus to make the entire people reasonably comfortable. Nor need we be surprised that frequently unreasonable demands are made by those whose minds have not been developed along the lines of finance, politics and religion, but who are coming to these subjects with crude, half-formed impressions, surmises, expectations. Is not this exactly what the Scriptures tell us respecting our day, the ‘‘time of the end’’—in which we have already been for one hundred and seven years? Do they not tell us that in this period would come the running to and fro of travel, which we now see about us everywhere, by which the various nations and peoples and classes are intermingled and waked up to the true situation of matters? Do we not see about us as another evidence of this time the fulfilment of the prediction, ‘‘Knowledge shall be increased’’? And is it not as a result of the increase of knowledge from this intermingling that the further prediction is to be fulfilled, ‘‘There shall be a time of trouble such as was not since there was a nation’’?—Danie] 12:1. HEATHEN NEW ENGLAND Rev. Dr. Hoar, of the Newton Theological Seminary, has been making a study of conditions in New England, and finally raises his voice in protest that instead of civilization elevating the people a marked degeneracy is in progress, This may be disappointing to those who have the wrong expectation for the future—to those who are hoping that the Millennium will be introduced by the conversion, sanctification, of the whole world of mankind to the extent that God’s will shall be done on earth as it is done in heaven. But for those who take the Scriptural view, Reverend Hoar’s findings are a further corroboration of the truth of the Bible. Our Lord’s words are confirmed, for he said, ‘‘When the Son of man cometh shall he find the faith on earth?’’—implying that the true faith would be very scarce at that time. It confirms the Apostle Paul’s statement that ‘‘evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived’’; and again, that “*In the last days [in the close of the present age, before the dawning of the new dispensation] perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, truce breakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasure more than lovers of God; having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof.’’— 2 Tim. 3:1-5. Reverend Hoar says:—‘‘There has come to some communities a disintegration and degeneration of public morals which has brought them down in moral tone below the mining camps of the west. Degenerates in mining camps are willing to acknowledge that they are bad, but not so with degenerates in New England. They commit the sins of the mining camps while they lay claim to respectability, and refuse to admit their guilt. There must be a mixture of wickedness in order to free them from a charge of being Puritanical. In 90 per cent. of the New England towns the large majority of the people have no intelligent faith about anything, and do not wish to have any. Serious religion, which interferes with personal aims and pleasures, is shunned and its advocates ridiculed. The condition seems utterly hopeless.’’ RESTATEMENT OF METHODIST FAITH Considerable agitation has been caused amongst our Methodist friends looking toward a revised statement of their creed; but, says the Michigan Christian Advocate, commenting on the question, ‘‘Present indications are that no revision of the Methodist creed will be undertaken in this generation.’’ The Methodist Times (London) admits that honesty seems to call for a revision, but claims that expediency frowns upon it. It says:— ‘«Theoretically a great deal might be said in favor of the [3898]
To enhance your experience on our website, we use cookies and similar technologies. Some cookies are essential for the core functionality of our site and cannot be declined. You can choose to accept or decline additional cookies. We want to assure you that none of this data will be sold or used for marketing purposes. You can adjust your preferences at any time by accessing the Privacy Settings from the footer of the page. For more information, please refer to our
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
.