Publication date
3/1/07
Volume
28
Number
5
The WatchTower
Views from the Watch Tower
../literature/watchtower/1907/5/1907-5-1.html
 
 
FEBRUARY 
IS. 
1907 
ZION}S 
WATCH 
TOWER 
the 
JJord's 
service. 
It 
is 
the 
same 
in 
every 
case. 
Nothing 
else 
that 
we 
have 
is 
common 
and 
equal-talents, 
opportuni­ 
ties, 
educational 
advantages, 
etc., 
are 
all 
variant, 
as 
well 
as 
physical 
and 
mental 
capabilities. 
Only 
from 
this 
standpoint 
of 
God's 
reckoning 
us 
perfect 
through 
Christ 
have 
we 
in 
any 
sense 
of 
the 
word 
II 
pound" 
apiece 
to 
use 
in 
the 
divine 
service. 
Each 
one 
during 
his 
life 
time 
is 
to 
use 
his 
pound, 
his 
opportunity 
secured 
through 
his 
justification. 
Each 
must 
trade 
with 
his 
pound, 
must 
exchange 
it, 
if 
he 
would 
make 
increase. 
We 
do 
lay 
down 
or 
exch1l.nge 
justified 
earthly 
rights, 
earthly 
interests, 
for 
heavenly 
ones,-and 
in 
proportion 
as 
we 
have 
zeal 
and 
energy 
in 
so 
doing 
will 
be 
our 
standing 
at 
the 
inspection 
when 
the 
nobleman 
returns. 
He 
who 
sacrifices 
most 
zealously 
his 
justified 
human 
nature, 
not 
only 
by 
con­ 
secrating 
it, 
but 
by 
daily 
sacrificing 
it, 
will 
be 
the 
one 
who 
will 
have 
the 
ten 
pounds 
at 
the 
conclusion 
of 
the 
test, 
and 
to 
such 
the 
Lord 
would 
say, 
Have 
thou 
dominion 
over 
ten 
cities. 
If, 
then, 
our 
reward 
at 
our 
Lord's 
hands 
is 
to 
be 
in 
pro­ 
portion 
as 
we 
shall 
be 
diligent 
in 
using 
this 
pound," 
oppor­ 
tunity 
received 
through 
our 
justijicatiO'fl, 
let 
us 
lay 
aside 
every 
weight 
and 
every 
besetting 
sin, 
and 
strive 
with 
patience 
to 
do 
with 
our 
might 
all 
that 
our 
hands 
find 
to 
do. 
The 
faithful 
ones 
seeking 
opportunities 
will 
find 
them; 
the 
less 
faithful, 
the 
less 
zealous, 
will 
find 
fewer, 
while 
others 
will 
pass 
them 
by, 
and 
ultimately 
miss 
the 
reward, 
and 
the 
op­ 
portuniti('s 
previously 
thetrs 
through 
justification 
will 
be 
given 
to 
those 
more 
zealous. 
LOVE 
THE 
FULFILLING 
OF 
THE 
LAW 
Questioll.-In 
the 
Berean 
Bible 
Study 
on 
Love 
Question 
is, 
"What 
is 
the 
difference 
between 
duty 
love 
(filio) 
and 
disinterested 
or 
divine 
love 
(agapee) 
am 
somewhat 
per­ 
plexed 
regarding 
this 
difference, 
and 
would 
thank 
you 
for 
lIttle 
more 
light 
on 
the 
subject. 
..tI.nswer.-Three 
different 
words 
in 
our 
Greek 
New 
Testa­ 
ment 
are 
translated 
love. 
The 
principal 
word, 
which 
well 
corr('sponds 
to 
our 
word 
love 
in 
English, 
is 
agapee. 
This 
word 
is 
used 
whenever 
the 
highest 
type 
of 
love 
is 
described; 
hence 
we 
have 
designated 
it 
disinterested 
or 
diVine 
love, 
as 
representing 
the 
highest 
type 
of 
love 
when 
used 
respect­ 
ing 
the 
Lord 
und 
his 
people. 
Nevertheless, 
just 
like 
our 
Eng- 
lish 
word 
love, 
agapee 
is 
also 
used 
in 
an 
inferior 
sense, 
as 
for 
instance 
when 
describing 
love 
for 
the 
world 
in 
the 
text, 
II 
If 
any 
man 
love 
[agapee] 
the 
world, 
the 
love 
[agapee] 
of 
the 
Father 
is 
not 
in 
him. 
"-1 
John 
2: 
15. 
The 
Greek 
word 
philadelphia 
signifies 
brotherly 
love, 
and 
of 
course 
is 
always 
used 
in 
good 
sense, 
because 
the 
brethren 
of 
the 
Lord 
are 
all 
Ii 
holy 
brethren." 
We 
are 
exhorted 
to 
develop 
this 
love 
for 
the 
brethren 
(philadelphia), 
and 
it 
is 
given 
as 
mark 
or 
indication 
that 
we 
are 
new 
creatures 
in 
Christ. 
Nevertheless 
the 
Apostle 
exhorts 
that 
we 
go 
on 
beyond 
this 
degree 
of 
love 
(philadelphia) 
and 
attain 
to 
the 
broader 
or 
divine 
love, 
the 
disinterested 
love 
(agapee). 
Note 
an 
instance 
of 
this: 
II 
Add 
to 
your 
faith 
patience, 
and 
to 
patience 
godliness, 
and 
to 
godliness 
brotherly 
kindness 
[phila­ 
delphia], 
and 
to 
brotherly 
kindness, 
charity-love 
[agapee]." 
(2 
Pet. 
:7.) 
The 
Apostle 
thus 
uses 
the 
word 
agapee 
to 
indicate 
the 
broader 
and 
more 
comprehensive 
love 
as 
the 
highest 
attainment 
of 
Christian 
character. 
Similarly, 
when 
describing 
the 
greatest 
thing 
in 
the 
world, 
in 
Corinthians 
13 
:2, 
3, 
4, 
8, 
13, 
the 
Apostle 
uses 
the 
Greek 
word 
agapee, 
love--in 
our 
common 
version 
translated 
charity. 
The 
cul­ 
mination 
of 
his 
argument 
is, 
'INow 
abideth 
faith, 
hope, 
charity 
[love-agapee] 
and 
the 
greatest 
of 
these 
is 
charity 
[love-;agapee]." 
..tI.gapee 
is 
also 
used 
in 
John 
3:1 
where 
the 
Apostle 
says, 
iiBehold 
what 
manner 
of 
love 
[agapee]"; 
and 
Ii 
He 
that 
dwelleth 
in 
love 
[agapee] 
dwelleth 
in 
God." 
In 
the 
next 
verse 
also 
we 
read, 
"Herein 
is 
our 
love 
[agapee] 
made 
perfect." 
Again 
we 
find 
agapee 
used 
by 
the 
Apostle 
in 
the 
statement, 
"God 
commendeth 
his 
love 
[agapee] 
to­ 
ward 
us"; 
and 
again, 
"Love 
[agapee] 
worketh 
no 
ill 
to 
his 
neighbor; 
therefore 
love 
[agapee] 
is 
the 
fulfilling 
of 
the 
law."-Rom. 
5:8, 
13. 
The 
Greek 
word 
filio, 
rendered 
love, 
we 
have 
designated 
'duty 
love," 
but 
we 
fear 
that 
this 
does 
not 
give 
sufficiently 
clear 
understanding 
of 
its 
meaning. 
The 
noun 
which 
is 
the 
basis 
for 
the 
verb 
is 
frequently 
translated 
kiss 
in 
the 
New 
Testament, 
and 
by 
implication 
the 
kiss 
belongs 
to 
the 
family 
and 
implies 
love 
that 
is 
more 
or 
less 
respect, 
or 
we 
might 
say 
exclusive 
or 
selfish-not 
general-not 
for 
everybody. 
It 
represents 
more 
of 
an 
individual 
or 
family 
love, 
and 
is 
used 
either 
in 
good 
or 
an 
evil 
sense, 
as, 
for 
instance, 
we 
read, 
The 
Father 
loveth 
the 
Son" 
(J 
ohn 
5: 
20); 
and 
again, 
I'The 
world 
will 
love 
its 
own. 
"-J 
ohn 
15: 
19. 
VOL. 
XXVIII 
ALLEGHENY, 
A., 
MARCH 
1, 
1907 
VIEWS 
FROM 
THE 
WATCH 
TOWER 
No.5 
CONCERNING 
FALLING 
STARS 
Our 
Society's 
London 
representative 
writes 
as 
follows:­ 
"London 
is 
getting 
stir-up 
over 
IThe 
New 
Theology,' 
as 
it 
is 
called. 
Rev. 
R. 
J. 
Campbell, 
who 
took 
Dr. 
Parker's 
place 
in 
London, 
thinks 
he 
has 
mission. 
Ritual 
and 
dogma 
are 
nothing 
to 
him, 
and 
he 
is 
laboring 
to 
break 
them 
to 
pieces. 
Man 
and 
God 
are 
indivisible; 
God 
is 
the 
sum-total 
of 
the 
consciousness 
of 
humanity-whatever 
that 
may 
be 
Jesus 
was 
man 
as 
other 
men, 
and 
was 
born 
in 
the 
same 
way: 
the 
difference 
in 
him 
being 
that 
he 
had 
more 
con­ 
sciousness 
of 
himself 
and 
of 
things. 
There 
is 
no 
need 
for 
the 
terms 
Unitarian 
and 
Trinitarian, 
since 
man 
and 
God 
are 
one. 
The 
teaching 
that 
the 
blood 
of 
the 
man 
Jesus 
Christ, 
who 
was 
killed 
nearly 
1900 
years 
ago, 
could 
in 
any 
way 
avail 
to 
cover 
man 
from 
guilt 
and 
that 
through 
faith 
in 
it 
man 
can 
find 
acceptance 
with 
God 
is 
both 
lamentable 
and 
mischievous. 
These 
are 
some 
of 
the 
things 
being 
said. 
Other 
wild 
things 
are 
that 
company 
of 
actors 
giving 
their 
services 
to 
interest 
some 
poor 
cripples 
were 
doing 
such 
work 
as 
Christ 
did 
on 
Calvary, 
and 
that 
tht' 
songs 
they 
sung, 
though 
not 
as 
fine 
words 
as 
the 
Psalms, 
were 
beyond 
them 
in 
actual 
effort. 
At 
any 
rate, 
this 
is 
to 
be 
seen-that 
the 
preacher 
in 
turning 
so 
sharply 
on 
the 
creeds 
will 
do 
something 
towards 
the 
dis­ 
integration 
of 
churchianity." 
The 
Rev. 
Campbell 
proclaims 
himself 
not 
merely 
higher­ 
critic 
infidel 
but 
an 
atheist 
as 
well; 
hut 
he 
does 
this 
in 
re­ 
fined 
terms 
so 
as 
not 
to 
alarm 
the 
flock 
he 
is 
misleading. 
To 
him 
God 
is 
either 
"it" 
or 
"him," 
with 
I' 
it" 
first 
and 
the 
"him" 
merely 
added 
as 
concession 
to 
the 
ignorance 
and 
superstition 
of 
his 
hearers 
and 
readers. 
Then, 
to 
give 
his 
atheism 
milder 
form 
than 
some, 
he 
objects 
to 
calling 
the 
Creator 
merely 
"blind 
force," 
preferring 
rather 
the 
vague 
term 
"consciousness." 
And 
what 
think 
you! 
This 
avowed 
infidel 
and 
atheist 
occupying 
the 
most 
prominent 
pulpit 
in 
Great 
Britain 
is 
about 
to 
instruct 
the 
preachers 
of 
Great 
Britain 
along 
these 
lines-Ii 
at 
their 
request." 
They 
are 
to 
assemble 
in 
various 
cities 
in 
conventions 
to 
hear 
this 
reverend 
D.D. 
prove 
to 
them 
the 
wisdom 
of 
David-" 
The 
fool 
hath 
said 
in 
his 
heart, 
There 
is 
no 
God." 
(Psa. 
14:1.) 
What 
better 
evidence 
could 
we 
have 
that 
the 
harvest 
work 
is 
urgently 
needed' 
Do 
we 
not 
see 
that 
as 
between 
Infidelity 
and 
Atheism 
in 
the 
pulpits 
and 
Christian 
Science, 
Spiritism, 
fanaticism 
and 
demonism 
in 
the 
pews, 
only 
the 
I' 
elect" 
can 
escape 
these 
"plagues,' 
'-and 
that 
the 
elect 
need 
the 
Helping 
Hands 
and 
Bible 
Keys 
speedily' 
We 
are 
fortunate 
in 
being 
able 
to 
quote 
Rev. 
Campbell's 
own 
words 
in 
the 
following 
extract 
from 
the 
New 
avell 
Union:- 
VIEWS 
OF 
THE 
REV. 
CAMPBELL-SAYS 
SAVIOR 
WAS 
DIVINE 
AND 
THAT 
EVERYONE 
IS 
"The 
great 
modifications 
in 
religious 
belief 
which 
are 
taking 
place 
throughout 
the 
Christian 
world 
have 
recently 
been 
manifesting 
themselves 
with 
especial 
prominence 
in 
Eng­ 
land. 
The 
leader 
in 
radical 
revision 
of 
faith 
is 
R. 
J. 
Camp­ 
hell, 
pastor 
of 
the 
City 
Temple 
and 
the 
recognized 
head 
of 
the 
English 
Nonconformists. 
He 
is 
about 
to 
make 
tour 
of 
the 
country, 
addressing 
gatherings 
of 
provincial 
pastors 
at 
their 
request 
upon 
the 
Restated 
Theology.' 
Inasmuch 
as 
Mr. 
Campbell 
rejects 
many 
of 
the 
chief 
dogmas 
of 
the 
Bible, 
such 
as 
the 
story 
of 
the 
fall 
of 
man, 
it 
will 
be 
seen 
how 
radically 
different 
from 
the 
old 
is 
the 
new 
theology, 
which 
is 
supplant­ 
ing 
the 
religious 
beliefs 
of 
generation 
ago 
in 
England. 
"Mr. 
Campbell 
states 
his 
views 
with 
the 
utmost 
frank­ 
ness 
in 
the 
London 
Daily 
.Mail, 
and 
inasmuch 
as 
he 
is 
almost 
as 
well 
known 
in 
America 
as 
in 
his 
own 
country 
they 
will 
attract 
equal 
attention 
on 
this 
side 
of 
the 
Atlantic. 
it 
IWe 
object,' 
he 
says, 
Ito 
the 
formal 
statements 
of 
Y-17 
FEBRUARY 1§, 1907 the Lord’s service. It is the same in every case. Nothing else that we have is common and equal—talents, opportunities, educational advantages, ete., are all variant, as well as physical and mental capabilities. Only from this standpoint of God’s reckoning us perfect through Christ have we in any sense of the word a ‘‘pound’’ apiece to use in the divine service. Each one during his life time is to use his pound, his opportunity secured through his justification. Each must trade with his ‘‘pound,’’ must exchange it, if he would make inerease. We do lay down or exchange justified earthly rights, earthly interests, for heavenly ones,—and in proportion as we have zeal and energy in so doing will be our standing at the inspection when the nobleman returns. He who sacrifices most zealously his justified human nature, not only by consecrating it, but by daily sacrificing it, will be the one who will have the ten pounds at the conclusion of the test, and to such the Lord would say, Have thou dominion over ten cities. If, then, our reward at our Lord’s hands is to be in proportion as we shall be diligent in using this ‘‘pound,’’ opportunity received through our justification, let us lay aside every weight and every besetting sin, and strive with patience to do with our might all that our hands find to do. The faithful ones seeking opportunities will find them; the less faithful, the less zealous, will find fewer, while others will pass them by, and ultimately miss the reward, and the opportunities previously theurs through justification will be given to those more zealous. LOVE THE FULFILLING OF THE LAW Question.—_In the Berean Bible Study on Love Question V is, ‘‘What is the difference between duty love (jilto) and disinterested or divine love (agapee)? I am somewhat perplexed regarding this difference, and would thank you for a httle more light on the subject. Answer.—Three different words in our Greek New Testament are translated love. The principal word, which well corresponds to our word love in English, is agapee. This word is used whenever the highest type of love is described; hence we have designated it disinterested or divine love, as representing the highest type of love when used respecting the Lord and his people. Nevertheless, just like our Eng ZION’S WATCH TOWER (63-67) lish word love, agapee is also used in an inferior sense, as for instance when describing love for the world in the text, ‘‘If any man love [agapee] the world, the love [agapee] of the Father is not in him.’’—1 John 2:16. The Greek word philadelphia signifies brotherly love, and of course is always used in a good sense, because the brethren of the Lord are all ‘‘holy brethren.’’ We are exhorted to develop this love for the brethren (philadelphia), and it is given as a mark or indication that we are new creatures in Christ. Nevertheless the Apostle exhorts that we go on beyond this degree of love (philadelphia) and attain to the broader or divine love, the disinterested love (agapee). Note an instance of this: ‘‘Add to your faith patience, and to patience godliness, and to godliness brotherly kindness [philadelphia], and to brotherly kindness, charity—love [agapee].’’ (2 Pet. 1:7.) The Apostle thus uses the word agapee to indicate the broader and more comprehensive love as the highest attainment of Christian character. Similarly, when describing the greatest thing in the world, in 1 Corinthians 13:2, 3, 4, 8, 13, the Apostle uses the Greek word agapee, love—in our common version translated charity. The culmination of his argument is, ‘‘Now abideth faith, hope, charity [love—agapee], and the greatest of these is charity [love—agapee].’’ Agapee is also used in 1 John 3:1 where the Apostle says, ‘‘Behold what manner of love [agapee]’’; and ‘“He that dwelleth in love [agapee] dwelleth in God.’’ In the next verse also we read, ‘‘Herein is our love [agapee] made perfect.’? Again we find agapee used by the Apostle in the statement, ‘‘God commendeth his love [agapee] toward us’’; and again, ‘‘Love fagapee] worketh no ill to his neighbor; therefore love [agapee] is the fulfilling of the law.’’—Rom. 5:8, 13. The Greck word filio, rendered love, we have designated ‘¢duty love,’’ but we fear that this does not give a sufficiently clear understanding of its meaning. The noun which is the basis for the verb is frequently translated kiss in the New Testament, and by implication the kiss belongs to the family and implies a love that is more or less respect, or we might say exclusive or selfish—not general—not for everybody. It represents more of an individual or family love, and is used either in a good or an evil sense, as, for instance, we read, ‘The Father loveth the Son’’ (John 5:20); and again, ‘‘The world will love its own.’’—John 15:19, Vou. XXVIII ALLEGHENY, PA., MARCH 1, 1907 VIEWS FROM THE WATCH TOWER CONCERNING FALLING STARS Our Society’s London representative writes as follows:— ‘‘London is getting a stir-up over ‘The New Theology,’ as it is called. A Rev. R. J. Campbell, who took Dr. Parker’s place in London, thinks he has a mission. Ritual and dogma are nothing to him, and he is laboring to break them to pieces. Man and God are indivisible; God is the sum-total of the consciousness of humanity—whatever that may be! Jesus was a man as other men, and was born in the same way: the difference in him being that he had more consciousness of himself and of things. There is no need for the terms Unitarian and Trinitarian, since man and God are one. The teaching that the blood of the man Jesus Christ, who was killed nearly 1900 years ago, could in any way avail to cover a man from guilt and that through faith in it a man can find acceptance with God is both lamentable and mischievous. These are some of the things being said. Other wild things are that a company of actors giving their services to interest some poor cripples were doing such work as Christ did on Calvary, and that the songs they sung, though not as fine words as the Psalms, were beyond them in actual effort. At any rate, this is to be seen—that the preacher in turning so sharply on the creeds will do something towards the disintegration of churchianity.’’ * * * The Rev. Campbell proclaims himself not merely a highercritic infidel but an atheist as well; but he does this in refined terms so as not to alarm the flock he is misleading. To him God is either ‘‘it’’ or ‘‘him,’’ with ‘‘it’’ first and the ‘‘him’’ merely added as a concession to the ignorance and superstition of his hearers and readers. Then, to give his atheism milder form than some, he objects to calling the Creator merely ‘‘blind foree,’’ preferring rather the vague term ‘‘consciousness.’’ V—17 And what think you! This avowed infidel and atheist occupying the most prominent pulpit in Great Britain is about to instruct the preachers of Great Britain along these lines—‘‘at their request.’? They are to assemble in various cities in conventions to hear this reverend D.D. prove to them the wisdom of David—‘‘The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.’’ (Psa. 14:1.) What better evidence could we have that the harvest work is urgently needed? Do we not see that as between Infidelity and Atheism in the pulpits and Christian Science, Spiritism, fanaticism and demonism in the pews, only the ‘‘elect’’ can cscape these ‘‘plagues,’’—and that the elect need the Helping Hands and Bible Keys speedily? We are fortunate in being able to quote Rev. Campbell’s own words in the following extract from the New Haven Union :— VIEWS OF THE REV. CAMPBELL—SAYS SAVIOR WAS DIVINE AND THAT EVERYONE IS ‘‘The great modifications in religious belief which are taking place throughout the Christian world have recently been manifesting themselves with especial prominence in England. The leader in radical revision of faith is R. J. Campbell, pastor of the City Temple and the recognized head of the English Nonconformists. He is about to make a tour of the country, addressing gatherings of provincial pastors at their request upon the ‘Restated Theology.’ Inasmuch as Mr. Campbell rejects many of the chief dogmas of the Bible, such as the story of the fall of man, it will be seen how radically different from the old is the new theology, which is supplanting the religious beliefs of a generation ago in England. ‘Mr. Campbell states his views with the utmost frankness in the London Daily Mail, and inasmuch as he is almost as well known in America as in his own country they will attract equal attention on this side of the Atlantic. ‘© We object,’ he says, ‘to the formal statements of [3949]

This website uses cookies to improve the website and your experience. By continuing to browse this website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. If you require further information or do not wish to accept cookies when using this website, please visit our Privacy Policy    Terms of Use    .