May 15, 1916 to themselves, the church, the clergy and society. Asked why this was, he answered, “They would forsake the churches, leave the ministry unsupported, and commit all sorts of excesses, unrestrained by fear of torture.” What a commentary on the moral effects of the ministry’s work! He confided in me the statement that he was a Universalist as well as an Evolutionist and Higher Critic; yet he rebuked me for preaching against eterna] torment! The third case was that of an Episcopal Bishop, who attended a semi-public meeting that I addressed this week on The Overthrow of Satan’s Empire. Before the service, in a conversation that he held with the elder of the class that gave the meeting, he very strongly defended the doctrine of Apostolic Succession and the divine right of the clergy. In this particular lecture the latter doctrine is attacked from many points of view. During the course of the lecture I did not deviate from my usual way of presenting the doctrine of the divine right of the clergy. My remarks on the subject, though delivered very kindly, seemed deeply to cut the bishop. His face became redder than the red in the Stars and Stripes that decorated the stage from which I spoke. The way he squirmed in his chair one would have thought that he was seated on pins. He remained throughout the entire lecture, but did not wait to meet me, I could not but think that we are now judging the kings and princes! By the way, there is ancther matter that I think might be well to bring to your attention, ie., the friends by letter asking the Pilgrims to answer questions. You will recall that some time ago, in view of the fact that they travel on oneday appointments, which scarcely leaves them time properly to do the work at the places they visit, as well as in view of the fact that the dear Lord, mindful of the needs of his dear flock, has through the Correspondence Department at the Tabernacle arranged for the answer of just such questions, you wrote the pilgrims a letter, which you afterwards published in the Tower, asking them to refer the brethren who asked them questions by mail to the page in the SruDins where the subject is treated, or better still, to write their uestions to the Correspondence Department at the Tabernacle, Judging from the number of letters that I receive asking questions, I have concluded that a large number of the friends have either overlooked or forgotten your letter on the subject. Feeling that it is for me to abide by your suggestion contained in the above-mentioned letter, I do not answer these questions, but write to them telling them the condition. This, of course, consumes time for them and me, and is doubtless disappointing to them. Is there not some way in which this matter can be brought to their attention, whereby they can be spared disappointment, as well as save the pilgrims’ time, and receive their answers all the sooner? -I am glad to note their zeal to learn the good Word of God, and would gladly answer their questions if this were in harmony with the Lord’s will; but under the circumstances it is of profit to nobody for them to write to the pilgrims for their information. For this THE WATCH TOWER (159-146) reason I thought it might be well to bring it to your attention, trusting that it may result in larger blessing to all concerned in the matter, The dear Lord has been blessing me richly in many way; both by toward and untoward circumstances. Was very much pleased by the reports of the year’s work of the Society. My prayer to the Lord is that he continue to bless his cause, people and servants, especially yourself among them. Rejoicing that I am privileged to be associated in this the best of fellowship and service with you, and sending you much Christian love, with the assurance of my continued prayers for, and co-operation with you, I remain Your brother and fellow servant, Pau. S. L. JOHNSON. ‘ABRAHAM SAW MY DAY AND WAS GLAD’’ My Dear BrorHer RUSSELL:— Greetings and love in the dear Lord! I take this opportunity of expressing my love for you, and for the service in which you are engaged so faithfully. It was in the year 1908 that I began to read the STupDIES IN THE Scriptures. From that time on I have not failed to find something to encourage, strengthen and uplift even though I have gone through many trials that have appeared more than I could bear, from outward observation. I am continually reading the STupIEs, and the “Old, Old Story,” which their pages forthtell with no uncertain sound, always appears new. I find each time I go through them something I never saw before. Recently I have been going through TaseRNacte Swapows again, and have been particularly struck with the thought that Abraham was justified by faith in Christ. I should be glad, dear brother, if you will explain just how it was possible for this to be. The question has been raised several times here and I have not been satisfied with the answers given at any time. Some have suggested that “If Brother Russell were writing TABERNACLE SHADOWS now he would not put those words in.....” Is this correct.” I have also heard on various occasions, when studying the Volumes, that Brother Russell has left various points without a full explanation in order that we might study for ourselves. I am, dear brother, Yours in the Anointed, EDITOR’S REPLY “Your Father Abraham rejoiced to see my day; he saw it and was glad.’—John 8:56. Abraham knew that God’s promise to bless all the families of the earth was sure to be fulfilled. He saw the day of Christ—the Millennium—and its glorious work by the eye of faith. Similarly he saw the great Messiah the King by the eye of faith; yea, more, by the same eye Abraham s«-~ ‘ho millions of Adam’s race blessed of God by the Messiah, his Seed, during the Millennium. INTERESTING QUESTIONS FOR MATURE BIBLE STUDENTS The Society is sending out to all pilgrim brethren a series of questions respecting the teachings of the Bible. They are not difficult for those who are well informed respecting the divine plan of the ages. The Society wishes, however, to see how clearly and concisely its representatives can answer such queries. The suggestion has come to us that others would like to have copies of these questions and to have the opportunity of presenting their answers. We would be pleased to have the matter so, and will send the questions to any of our subscribers, on request. We believe that the suggestion is especially good in respect to those who are occupying any position of influence or serving amongst the brethren. It does us all good to think, and helps to establish us as respects what we know well and what we do not so clearly know, and thus leads on to a clearer knowledge of the truth and to the graces which, properly, should accompany every step of knowledge. Vor, XXXVIT BROOKLYN, N. Y., JUNE 1, 1916 No. 11 TRAINING OUR AFFECTIONS HEAVENWARD “Set your affection on things above, not on things on the earth.’—Colossians 3:2. In the natural make-up of humanity there is a certain tendency which we all recognize as a sort of mental sacrilege, although we are unable to philosophize upon it or to explain it. So surely as we are men and women we have certain impulses of affection, certain powers that go out toward other creatures, other things; and it is very important that we see where they are tending; otherwise they will lead to idolatry. Just as the little tendrils of a vine will take hold of whatever is within reach, so our affections go out to various earthly objects; and they need to be pruned and trained, just as a vine needs to be. When you desire to have your vine grow a certain way, you turn it in the proper direction, tie it if need be, and see that its tendrils take hold of the proper supports. VARIOUS WORLDLY OBJECTS OF AFFECTION Thus it is with each of us. These affections are proper, they are good; but they need guiding, training. If we did not have these affections, we could not love God. We must have them in order to a proper balance of character. Without them we could not hold together. The need for their proper guidance is manifest when we see some lady setting her affections on a little dog, giving it much time, care, choice food, etc. Some of the wealthy set their affections on poodle dogs, bull dogs, bird dogs or Angora cats. Some make pets of Canary birds, rabbits, white mice, ete. They spend upon those pets much valuable time, thought and care that might be much better spent in other ways—often treating them as if they [5905}
This website uses cookies to improve the website and your experience. By continuing to browse this website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. If you require further information or do not wish to accept cookies when using this website, please visit our Privacy PolicyTerms of Use.