Publication date
5/1/19
Volume
40
Number
9
The WatchTower
Views from the Watch Tower
The Watchtower Magazines
../literature/watchtower/1919/9/1919-9-2.html
MAY 
1. 
1919 
TIlE 
WATCH 
TOWER 
II 
~I 
I 
~l) 
THB 
TWO-HORNED 
BEAST 
AND 
THE 
IMAGE 
After 
identifying 
the 
ten-horned 
beast 
as 
Papal 
Rome, 
Brother 
Ru~,*11 
,'xplained 
that 
the 
two-hornl'd 
beast 
of 
Revela­ 
tion 
13 
represented 
the 
ehureh-nation 
of 
Great 
Britain 
and 
Ireland; 
for 
it 
also 
is 
a 
'government 
which 
combines 
ecclesi­ 
asticism 
with 
civil 
power. 
The 
bishops 
of 
the 
church 
have 
~eats 
in 
the 
British 
parliament, 
and 
the 
king 
is 
offici~lIy 
recognized 
as 
the 
head 
of 
the 
chun'h 
as 
well 
as 
of 
the 
natIOn. 
In 
1846 
A. 
D. 
the 
other 
Protestant 
denominations 
leagued 
together 
for 
the 
obvious 
reason 
of 
giving 
themselves 
mure 
dignity 
and 
authority. 
This 
league 
was 
called 
"The 
Evangel­ 
ical 
Alliance," 
but 
for 
about 
70 
years 
it 
has 
been 
merely 
an 
imagt'--lifeless, 
having 
no 
power. 
The 
Revelator, 
however, 
indicates 
that 
this 
lifeless 
image 
would 
receive 
vitality 
or 
power 
in 
the 
end 
of 
the 
Gospel 
age, 
sometiml' 
betWl'en 
the 
out­ 
pourin" 
of 
the 
sixth 
and 
seventh 
plagues, 
and 
that 
ih 
name 
would 
then 
be 
changl'd 
to 
that 
of 
"false 
prophet." 
We 
have 
sel'n 
this 
fulfilled. 
The 
vitalizing 
breath 
has 
already 
entered 
into 
the 
imngl', 
ulld 
it 
has 
already 
manifested 
its 
newly 
gained 
authority. 
But, 
like 
the 
new-born 
babe, 
it 
waxes 
stronger 
as 
time 
goes 
on. 
The 
Revelator 
shows 
that 
the 
vitalizing 
of 
the 
image 
was 
to 
come 
from 
the 
two-horned 
beast. 
A 
few 
years 
ago 
the 
Episcopal 
Church 
became 
friendly 
toward 
the 
Church 
Federa­ 
tion 
movement, 
and 
even 
permitted 
ministers 
of 
other 
de­ 
nominations 
to 
enter 
its 
pulpits. 
Commenting 
upon 
this, 
in 
THE 
WATCH 
TOWER 
of 
~ovember 
15, 
1913, 
Brotner 
Russell 
said: 
"Perhaps 
this 
recognition 
of 
the 
image 
is 
all 
the 
vitaliza­ 
tion 
the 
image 
needs, 
but 
we 
are 
inclined 
to 
expect 
more. 
For 
years 
the 
Rpiscopalians 
have 
'proffered. 
re-ordination 
to 
the 
ministers 
of 
the 
different 
denominations 
represented 
in 
the 
Evangelical 
Alliance, 
and 
they 
still 
proffer 
it. 
We 
have 
been 
inclined 
to 
expect 
that 
the 
ministers 
would 
finally 
con­ 
cede 
the 
point 
and 
acel'pt 
a 
re-ordination 
at 
the 
hands 
of 
an 
Episcopal 
bishop." 
IlUNISTERS 
SEEK 
EPISCOPAL 
BE-ORDINATION' 
Early 
last 
year 
certain 
Protestant 
ministers 
of 
the 
Evan­ 
g-elical 
Alliance, 
notably 
the 
leaders 
oi 
the 
Congregational 
denomination, 
made 
overtures 
to 
the 
Episcopal 
House 
of 
Rishops 
then 
in 
session 
in 
New 
York 
City. 
Since 
then 
the 
movement 
has 
taken 
dl'finite 
form; 
and 
now 
comes 
the 
report 
that 
twelve 
leading 
bishops 
and 
high 
churchmen 
of 
the 
Epis­ 
copal 
denomination 
and 
nine 
leading 
lighb 
of 
the 
Congrega­ 
tional 
church 
have 
jointly 
formulated 
a 
canon 
to 
be 
pre· 
sented 
at 
the 
triennial 
session 
of 
the 
General 
Convention 
of 
the 
Episcopal 
Churoh, 
to 
,be 
held 
in 
Detroit 
this 
summer. 
The 
canon 
contains 
a 
s('ries 
of 
"proposals 
for 
an 
approach 
toward 
unity," 
which 
have 
been 
agreed 
upon 
by 
the 
EpillCO' 
pal 
bishops 
and 
the 
non-Episcopal 
ministers, 
the 
principal 
feature 
of 
which 
is 
that 
ordained 
clergymen 
of 
the 
Evangelical 
Alliance 
shall 
receive, 
in 
addition 
to 
the 
present 
ordination 
at 
the 
hands 
of 
an 
Episeopal 
bishop, 
and 
yet 
remain 
ministers 
in 
good 
standing 
with 
their 
own 
respective 
denominations. 
The 
significance 
of 
this 
revolutionary 
'procedure 
is 
further 
empha­ 
sized, 
following, 
as· 
it 
does, 
on 
the 
heels 
of 
the 
mission 
of 
the 
three 
Episcopal 
bishops 
to 
the 
Pope 
of 
Rome 
in 
behalf 
of 
church 
unity, 
as 
commented 
upon 
in 
our 
last 
issue. 
The 
canon 
on 
which 
the 
Episcopal 
and 
non-Episcopal 
min· 
isters 
have 
agreed, 
reads 
in 
part 
as 
follows: 
"In 
conferring 
or 
in 
accepting 
such 
ordination 
[Episcopal] 
neither 
the 
bishop 
ordaining 
nor 
the 
minister 
ordained 
should 
be 
understood 
to 
impugn 
thereby 
the 
efficacy 
of 
the 
minister's 
previous 
ministry. 
. 
. 
. 
A 
minister 
!l0 
ordained 
may 
officiate 
in 
a 
diocese 
or 
missionary 
district 
of 
this 
church 
[Episcopal] 
when 
licensed 
by 
the 
ecclesiastieal 
authority 
thereof, 
but 
he 
shall 
not 
become 
the 
rector 
or 
minister 
of 
!tny 
parish 
or 
con· 
greg!ttion 
of 
this 
church 
[Episcopal)." 
The 
conditions 
upon 
which 
any 
member 
of 
the 
Evangelical 
Alliance 
may 
obtain 
re-ordination 
at 
the 
hands 
of 
an 
Epis­ 
copal 
bishop 
are 
outlined 
in 
the 
canon 
as 
follows: 
"At 
the 
time 
of 
his 
ordination 
the 
person 
to 
be 
ordained 
shall 
subscribe 
and 
make 
in 
the 
presence 
of 
the 
bishop 
a 
dedaration 
that 
he 
believes 
the 
Holy 
Scriptures 
to 
be 
the 
Word 
of 
('rod.; 
• 
. 
• 
. 
that 
in 
the 
ministry 
of 
baptism 
he 
will 
unfailingly 
baptize 
with 
water 
in 
the 
name 
of 
the 
Father 
and 
the 
Son 
and 
Holy 
Ghost; 
and 
that 
in 
the 
C'elebration 
of 
the 
Holy 
Communion 
he 
will 
invariably 
use 
ele~ents 
of 
bread 
and 
wine, 
and 
will 
include 
in 
the 
service 
the 
words 
and 
acts 
of 
our 
Lord 
in 
the 
institution 
of 
the 
sacrament, 
the 
Lord's 
Prayer 
and 
the 
Apostles' 
or 
the 
Nicene 
Creed 
as 
the 
symbol 
of 
the 
faith 
of 
the 
holy 
Catholic 
Church: 
that 
when 
thereto 
invited 
by 
the 
bishop 
of 
the 
church 
[Episcopal] 
having 
juris­ 
diction 
in 
the 
place 
where 
he 
lives, 
he. 
will, 
unless 
unavoidably 
prevented, 
meet 
with 
such 
bishop 
for 
communion 
and 
for 
counsel 
and 
co-operation; 
and 
that 
he 
shall 
hold 
hiJlli!elf 
answerable 
to 
the 
bishop 
of 
this 
church 
[Epi5copalj 
having 
jurisdiction 
in 
the 
place 
where 
he 
lives; 
or 
if 
there 
be 
no 
such 
bishop, 
to 
the 
presiding 
bishop 
of 
this 
church 
lEpiscu­ 
pal]." 
The 
Congregationalists 
are 
not 
alone 
in 
making 
overtures 
for 
Episcopal 
re-ordination, 
and 
the 
bishops 
of 
the 
Church 
l?f 
England 
proffer 
it 
with 
no 
less 
enthusiasm 
than 
do 
their 
brethren 
of 
America 
and 
elsewhere. 
We 
quote 
the 
following 
London 
diilpateh 
as 
published 
in 
the 
Philadelphia 
Public 
Ledger 
of 
March 
27, 
1919: 
"Definite 
proposals 
for 
a 
union 
of 
the 
Wesleyan 
Methodist 
Chureh 
with 
the 
Church 
of 
England 
are 
made 
by 
the 
Right 
Rev. 
Dr. 
Arthur 
F. 
W. 
Ingram, 
Bishop 
of 
London. 
The 
bishop 
suggests 
that 
Anglicans 
and 
W('sleyans 
should 
unite, 
because, 
he 
lIays, 
'No 
religious 
body 
was 
ever 
closer 
to 
the 
church 
than 
the 
Wesleyans.' 
Under 
this 
plan, 
bishops 
would 
bE' 
present 
at 
the 
ordinations 
of 
the 
Wesleyan 
Methodist 
Church, 
which 
would 
become 
an 
order 
within 
the 
Church 
of 
England, 
but 
would 
retain 
its 
own 
practices, 
Wesleyan 
pastors 
would, 
if 
they 
preferred, 
,be 
ordained 
by 
their 
own 
bishops. 
When 
the 
principle 
of 
union 
is 
established, 
the 
Bishop 
of 
London 
would 
favor 
an 
exchange 
of 
pulpits." 
EPISCOPAL 
ASO 
CATHOLIC 
TO 
FILL 
PULPIT 
Bishop 
David 
H. 
Greer, 
of 
the 
New 
York 
Diocese 
of 
the 
church 
unity 
has 
asked 
that 
a 
Roman 
Catholic 
priest 
be 
per­ 
mitted 
to 
conduct 
One 
of 
the 
Holy 
Week 
services 
in 
the 
Cathedral 
of 
St. 
John 
the 
Divine. 
Thus 
the 
Episcopal 
church 
acts 
as 
"mediator" 
between 
the 
beast 
and 
the 
enlivened 
image, 
proffering 
to 
each 
a 
friendly 
hand. 
We 
quote 
from 
the 
N. 
Y. 
Tribune 
of 
March 
:n: 
"I 
would 
gladly 
welcome 
a 
Catholic 
to 
take 
one 
of 
these 
services 
in 
the 
Cathedral," 
said 
Bishop 
Greer. 
"I 
feel 
friendly 
toward 
all 
the 
orthodox 
denominations, 
and 
believe 
that 
broud 
and 
generous 
sympathy 
should 
prevail 
throughout 
the 
church. 
I 
don't 
believe 
in 
breaking 
down 
the 
barriers 
of 
the 
church, 
but 
neither 
do 
I 
believe 
that 
they 
should 
be 
so 
high 
that 
you 
can't 
get 
them 
down 
'Or 
climb 
over 
them." 
When 
asked 
if 
the 
unity 
program 
would 
not 
tend 
to 
de­ 
>!troy 
the 
individuality 
of 
the 
various 
Protestant 
churches, 
and 
give 
a 
eertain 
precedent 
to 
the 
Episcopal 
Church, 
Bishop 
dreer 
is 
reported 
to 
have 
replied: 
"Certainly 
not. 
None 
of 
the 
churches 
would 
lose 
its 
individuality, 
Precedents 
would 
'be 
given 
to 
the 
episcopate-not 
to 
the 
Episcopal 
Church. 
It 
would 
mean 
the 
universal 
recognition 
of 
a 
historic 
order 
dating 
back 
to 
apostolic 
times." 
All 
this 
is 
in 
fulfillment 
of 
the 
teachings 
of 
the 
Laodicean 
servant, 
Pastor 
Russell, 
who 
foretold 
from 
the 
Scriptures 
more 
than 
thirty-five 
years 
ago 
the 
course 
which 
all 
denomi­ 
nations, 
including 
the 
Episcopal 
and 
Ca.tholic 
churches, 
would 
take 
in 
the 
end 
of 
thiS 
age. 
We 
quote 
further 
from 
his 
statement 
in 
THE 
WATCH 
TOWER 
of 
November 
15th, 
1913 
.. 
"According 
to 
the 
old, 
but 
erroneous 
thought 
handed 
down 
for 
centuries, 
the 
bishops 
of 
the 
Church 
of 
'&ngland 
and 
of 
the 
Church 
of 
Rome 
are 
'.Apostolic 
Bishops,' 
or 
successors 
to 
the 
Apostles, 
according 
to 
the 
old 
theory 
of 
Apostolic 
Succes­ 
sion. 
.According 
to 
that 
same 
theory, 
no 
one 
on 
earth 
has 
one 
particle 
of 
ri~ht 
to 
teach 
and 
to 
preach 
except 
as 
those 
'Apos­ 
tolic 
Bishops 
.shall 
grant 
their 
permission 
by 
laying 
on 
their 
hands. 
According 
to 
tbis 
rule, 
then, 
Methodists, 
Baptists, 
Lutherans, 
Presbyterians, 
and 
all 
such, 
are 
preaching 
without 
authority. 
When 
they 
talk 
about 
ordination 
they 
merely 
mean 
that 
each 
sect 
ordains 
its 
own 
ministers. 
The 
Evangel­ 
ical 
Alliance 
is 
l!ttemllting 
to 
get 
around 
this 
difficulty 
and 
to 
have 
the 
sects 
recogmze 
each 
other's 
ordination. 
The 
federa­ 
tion 
is 
building 
upon 
this 
general 
recognition 
of 
'orthodoxy,' 
and 
is 
about 
to 
be 
given 
life, 
virility, 
power, 
dignity, 
by 
something 
whioh 
the 
Church 
of 
England 
will 
do 
for 
them 
whieh 
will 
recognize 
their 
ordination 
as 
ministers. 
"We 
may 
be 
sure 
that 
they 
will 
make 
the 
road 
to 
the 
preaching 
and 
tea.ehing 
of 
the 
Gospel 
a 
very 
narrow 
one 
to 
all 
attempting 
to 
preaeh 
without 
their 
reeognition 
and 
ordina­ 
tion. 
These 
will 
be 
trying 
times 
upon 
us, 
and 
upon 
all 
who 
will 
refuse 
to 
worship 
the 
beast 
and 
his 
image, 
or 
to 
receive 
the 
mark 
of 
the 
beast 
upon 
-his 
forehead 
or 
upon 
the 
hand.­ 
Revelation 
13:15·17." 
JtBLIGIOJrII'fS' 
paOBLBKlI 
Ilf'rBlf8IPYIHG 
An 
outstanding 
problem 
of 
"Churl'h 
Christians" 
has 
always 
been, 
how 
to 
raise 
more 
money. 
Their 
perplexities 
art' 
not 
decreasing 
as 
the 
days 
go 
by. 
Following 
we 
quote 
a 
few 
extracts 
from 
a 
booklet 
''The 
Financial 
Resources 
of 
Meth­ 
odism," 
published 
reeentiy 
by 
tlte 
Joint 
Cefttenary 
Committee 
of 
the 
Methodist 
Episcopal 
Church 
and 
the 
Methodist 
Epis­ 
copal 
Church, 
South. 
This 
booklet 
is 
an 
appeal 
for 
money, 
an 
artful, 
e.n 
efficient, 
a 
business-like 
appeal,but 
the 
lIame 
in 
substance 
as 
the 
old-time 
passing 
of 
the 
hat. 
[6425] 
May 1, 1919 THE TWO-HORNED BEAST AND THE IMAGE After identifying the ten-horned beast as Papal Rome, Brother Russell explained that the two-horned beast of Revelation 13 represented the church-nation of Great Britain and Ireland; for it also is a government which combines ecclesiasticism with civil power. The bishops of the church have seats in the British parliament, and the king is officially recognized as the head of the church ag well as of the nation. In 1846 A. D. the other Protestant denominations leagued together for the obvious reason of giving themselves mure dignity and authority. This league was called “The Evangelical Alliance,” but for about 70 years it has been merely an image—lifeless, having no power. The Revelator, however, indicates that this lifeless image would receive vitality or power in the end of the Gospel age, sometime between the outpouring of the sixth and seventh plagues, and that its name would then be changed to that of “false prophet.” We have seen this fulfilled. The vitalizing breath has already entered into the image, and it has already manifested its newly gained authority. But, like the new-born babe, it waxes stronger as time goes on. The Revelator shows that the vitalizing of the image was to come from the two-horned beast. A few years ago the Episcopal Church became friendly toward the Church Federation movement, and even permitted ministers of other denominations to enter its pulpits. Commenting upon this, in THe WatcH Tower of November 15, 1913, Brother Russell said: “Perhaps this recognition of the image is all the vitalization the image needs, but we are inclined to expect more. For years the Episcopalians have proffered, re-ordination to the ministers of the different denominations represented in the Evangelical Alliance, and they still proffer it. We have been inclined to expect that the ministera would finally concede the point and accept a re-ordination at the hands of an Episcopal bishop.” MINISTERS SEEK EPISCOPAL RE-ORDINATION Early last year certain Protestant ministers of the Evangelical Alliance, notably the leaders of the Congregational denomination, made overtures to the Episcopal House of Bishops then in session in New York City. Since then the movement has taken definite form; and now comes the report that twelve leading bishops and high churchmen of the Episcopal denomination and nine leading lights of the Congregational church have jointly formulated a canon to be presented at the triennial session of the General Convention of the Episcopal Church, to be held in Detroit this summer. The canon contains a series of “proposals for an approach toward unity,” which have heen agreed upon by the Episcopal bishops and the non-Episcopal ministers, the principal feature of which is that ordained clergymen of the Evangelical Alliance shall receive, in addition to the present ordination at the hands of an Episcopal bishop, and yet remain ministers in good standing with their own respective denominations. The significance of this revolutionary procedure is further emphasized, following, as- it does, on the heels of the mission of the three Episcopal bishops to the Pope of Rome in behalf of church unity, as commented upon in our last issue. The canon on which the Episcopal and non-Episcopal ministers have agreed, reads in part as follows: “In conferring or in accepting such ordination [Episcopal] neither the bishop ordaining nor the minister ordained should be understood to impugn thereby the efficacy of the minister’s previous ministry. ...A minister so ordained may officiate in a diocese or missionary district of this church [Episcopal] when licensed by the ecclesiastical authority thereof, but he shall not become the rector or minister of any parish or congregation of this church [Episeopal].” The conditions upon which any member of the Evangelical Alliance may obtain re-ordination at the hands of an Episcopal bishop are outlined in the canon as follows: “At the time of his ordination the person to be ordained shall subscribe and make in the presence of the bishop a declaration that he believes the Holy Scriptures to be the Word of God; .... that in the ministry of baptism he will unfailingly baptize with water in the name of the Father and the Son and Holy Ghost; and that in the celebration of the Holy Communion he will invariably use elements of bread and wine, and will include in the service the words and acts of our Lord in the institution of the sacrament, the Lord’s Prayer and the Apostles’ or the Nicene Creed as the symbol of the faith of the holy Catholic Church: that when thereto invited by the bishop of the church [Episcopai] having jurisdiction in the place where he lives, he, will, unless unavoidably prevented, meet with such bishop for communion and for counsel and co-operation; and that he shall hold himself THE WATCH TOWER (131 132) answerable to the bishop of this church [Episcopal] having jurisdiction in the place where he lives; or if there be no suet bishop, to the presiding bishop of this church {Episcopa ed The Congregationalists are not alone in making overtures for Episcopal re-ordination, and the bishops of the Church of England proffer it with no less enthusiasm than do their brethren of America and elsewhere. We quote the following London dispatch as published in the Philadelphia Public Ledger of March 27, 1919: “Definite proposals for a union of the Wesleyan Methodist Chureh with the Church of England are made by the Right Rev. Dr. Arthur F. W. Ingram, Bishop of London. The bishop suggests that Anglicans and Wesleyans should unite, because, he says, ‘No religious body was ever closer to the church than the Wesleyans.’ Under this plan, bishops would be present at the ordinations of the Wesleyan Methodist Church, which would become an order within the Church of England, but would retain its own practices. Wesleyan pastors would, if they preferred, be ordained by their own bishops. When the principle of union is established, the Bishop of London would favor an exchange of pulpits.” EPISCOPAL ASKS CATHOLIC TO FILL PULPIT Bishop David H. Greer, of the New York Diocese of the church unity has asked that a Roman Catholic priest be permitted to conduct one of the Holy Week services in the Cathedral of St. John the Divine. Thus the Episcopal church acts as “mediator” between the beast. and the enlivened image, proffering to each a friendly hand. We quote from the N. Y. Tribune of March 31: “I would gladly welcome a Catholic to take one of these services in the Cathedral,” said Bishop Greer. “I feel friendly toward all the orthodox denominations, and believe that broad and generous sympathy should prevail throughout the church. I don’t believe in breaking down the barriers of the church, but neither do I believe that they should be so high that you can’t get them down cr climb over them.” When asked if the unity program would not tend to destroy the individuality of the various Protestant churches, and give a certain precedent to the Episcopal Church, Bishop Greer is reported to have replied: “Certainly not. None of the churches would lose its imdividuality, Precedents would be given to the episcopate—not to the Episcopal Church. It would mean the universal recognition of a historic order dating back to apostolic times.” All this is in fulfillment of the teachings of the Laodicean servant, Pastor Russell, who foretold from the Scriptures more than thirty-five years ago the course which all denominations, including the Episcopal and Catholic churches, would take in the end of this age. We quote further from his statement in THE Watcn Tower of November 15th, 1913+ “According to the old, but erroneous thought handed down for centuries, the bishops of the Church of England and of the Church of Rome are ‘Apostolic Bishops,’ or successors to the Apostles, according to the old theory of Apostolic Succession. According to that same theory, no one on earth has one particle of right to teach and to preach except as those ‘Apostolic Bishops’ shall grant their permission by laying on their hands. According to this rule, then, Methodists, Baptists, Lutherans, Presbyterians, and all such, are preaching without authority. When they talk about ordination they merely mean that each sect ordains its own ministers. The Evangelical Alliance is attempting to get around this difficulty and to have the sects recognize each other’s ordination. The federation is building upon this general recognition of ‘orthodoxy,’ and is about to given life, virility, power, dignity, by something which the Church of England will do for them which will recognize their ordination as ministers. “We may be sure that they will make the road to the preaching and teaching of the Gospel a very narrow one to all attempting to preach without their recognition and ordination. These will be trying times upon us, and upon all who will refuse to worship the beast and his image, or to receive the mark of the beast upon his forehead or upon the hand.— Revelation 13:15-17.” RELIGIONISTS’ PROBLEMS INTENSIFYING An outstanding problem of “Church Christians” has always been, how to raise more money. Their perplexities are not decreasing as the days go by. Following we quote a few extracts from a booklet The Financial Resources of Methodism,” published recently by the Joint Centenary Committee of the Methodist Episcopal Church and the Methodist Episcopal Church, South. This booklet is an appeal for money, an artful, an efficient, a business-like a aL but the same in substance as the old-time passing of the hat. [6425]

This website uses cookies to improve the website and your experience. By continuing to browse this website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. If you require further information or do not wish to accept cookies when using this website, please visit our Privacy Policy    Terms of Use    .